Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-sequenced workflow with strong validation checkpoints and good token efficiency. The main gap is the missing referenced best-practices file and the absence of a concrete cell-editing example.
Suggestions
Create the referenced `reference/best_practices.md` file so the Best Practices link resolves, or remove the reference.
Add a short copy-paste example of editing a marimo cell (e.g., a minimal `@app.cell` snippet) to raise actionability.
Clarify how `write`/`search_replace` map to marimo's auto-sync (one sentence) so the Execute step is fully unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: terse tool calls with one-line purposes, concrete rules ("No `plt.show()`", "no global state"), and no padding or explanation of basics Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete MCP tool names and specific rules give mostly executable guidance, but the edit step ("Edit the `.py` file directly using `write` or `search_replace`") lacks a copy-paste code/cell example covering the common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Plan-Execute-Verify sequence with an explicit "Verify (CRITICAL)" checkpoint (lint, runtime errors, outputs) provides a real validation feedback loop, satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference, but the referenced file `reference/best_practices.md` does not exist in the bundle, so the link is dangling. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |