Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and appropriately minimal for a simple skill, but its guidance is vague and lacks executable detail or a clearly sequenced workflow with explicit verification checkpoints. A typo ('You must add follow the plan') also slightly undermines clarity.
Suggestions
Replace vague direction with concrete steps, e.g. '1. Read the plan file end-to-end. 2. Implement each section in order. 3. For each section, add a pytest test and run `pytest -q` before moving on.'
Fix the typo 'You must add follow the plan' to 'Follow the plan'.
Add an explicit validation loop: run the test suite after each section and only proceed once tests pass.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is extremely lean (a heading and two short bullets) with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives some concrete guidance ('Make a test for every section... using pytest') but the rest is vague ('follow the plan', 'read research if you have questions') with no executable code, commands, or examples, fitting the incomplete-guidance anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are present as a loose bullet list (follow plan -> read research if needed -> test each section) but the sequence is not tightly ordered and validation checkpoints are only implicit, matching the 'listed but checkpoints missing or implicit' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill well under 50 lines with no need for external references, and it is reasonably organized with a heading and bulleted guidance, so per the simple-skill note it qualifies for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |