CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

qodo-review-notes

Find and maintain Development Track Notes and PR Review Notes through Qodo tools. Use at task intake or when resuming a development effort, before opening a PR, after opening it to bind its notes, or when asked to read or edit reviewer context. Tracks connect issues, repositories and PRs; PR notes explain a specific change. This skill does not review code or open a PR.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A dense, operationally precise instruction skill with an explicit sequenced workflow, thorough validation gates, and detailed error-recovery loops — its weakest points are token weight and offloading: roughly a third of the body is rarely-needed contingency procedure inlined in SKILL.md instead of reference files. The guidance that is present is almost entirely concrete and executable, with only the track-search and track-save operations lacking worked examples.

Suggestions

Move the contingency procedures — Manual enterprise skill updates, Runtime recovery, the deep pagination rules, and Git remote-form resolution — into reference files linked at their trigger points (as already done for windows-shells.md and windows-launcher.md), keeping SKILL.md to the core intake → maintain → publish → bind workflow.

Tighten the dense multi-clause sentences in the main workflow sections (e.g. 'Publish PR Review Notes', MT-CONFLICT handling, and the track-find steps) into short imperative bullets so each rule costs fewer tokens to read and apply.

Add a concrete find-tracks and save-track argument example in the same style as the prepare-pr JSON example, so the two most common write operations are as executable as the ones already covered.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

No padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and sentences are maximally terse, but the ~380-line body carries substantial contingency detail inlined in SKILL.md (enterprise update procedures, runtime recovery, pagination edge cases, Git remote-URL forms) that inflates the token budget well beyond the core workflow. Not a 4 because the trimming needed is more than minor; not a 2 because nothing is padded or unnecessary — it is all real operational detail, just voluminous and dense to the point of hard parsing.

3 / 5

Actionability

Highly executable: copy-paste CLI discovery commands with full flags, a complete JSON args-file example for prepare-pr, a complete MCP bind-pr call, an operations table with wire names and required identity fields, and typed error codes with exact remediation steps. Not a 5 because the two most common write operations — find-tracks search arguments and save-track document structure — lack concrete argument examples, relying instead on the live-schema discovery contract.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Instructions section states the end-to-end sequence (discover tools → select track → maintain revision-safe notes → publish before PR → bind after opening), the intake procedure is a numbered 1-5 sequence with decision points, and validation gates plus feedback loops are explicit throughout ("Wait for a durable publication receipt and ready_to_open_pr=true before opening a new PR"; MT-CONFLICT reread-merge-new-key-retry; pagination discard-and-restart). Not a 4 — no validation gaps are apparent.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The two bundle references are well integrated — "read [shell guidance](references/windows-shells.md) before the first call; [launcher recovery](references/windows-launcher.md) only if invocation fails" — clearly signaled, conditional, and one level deep, and section headers organize the body. Not a 5 because sizable contingency sections (Manual enterprise skill updates, Runtime recovery, deep pagination rules, Git remote-form resolution) that belong in reference files are inlined, keeping SKILL.md monolithic rather than an overview; not a 3 because the structure and reference signaling that do exist are clean and the inlined material is genuinely operational rather than misplaced bulk reference content.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states concrete capabilities in third person, gives an explicit multi-scenario 'Use when' clause covering intake, resumption, pre-PR and post-PR timing, and closes with a clear scope boundary. The only gaps are unnamed operations (publish/create) and a few missing natural synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — "Find and maintain Development Track Notes and PR Review Notes", "bind its notes", "read or edit reviewer context" — with only minor gaps (core operations like creating/publishing tracks are not named). It is not a 5 because coverage is not comprehensive, and not a 3 because more than 1-2 specific actions are listed.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly answers both: what ("Find and maintain Development Track Notes and PR Review Notes through Qodo tools... Tracks connect issues, repositories and PRs; PR notes explain a specific change") and when (an explicit 'Use at/when' clause with four concrete trigger scenarios). Score 4 would require the 'when' to be less explicit, but it is fully specified, plus a clear boundary statement.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases are well covered: "Use at task intake or when resuming a development effort, before opening a PR, after opening it to bind its notes, or when asked to read or edit reviewer context" — phrasings a user would genuinely say. Not a 5 because common synonyms/variants (e.g. "review notes", "handoff", "publish notes") are absent; better than 3 since multiple distinct natural trigger scenarios are explicitly present.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (Qodo platform notes for tracks and PRs) with distinct platform-specific triggers and an explicit negative boundary — "This skill does not review code or open a PR" — minimizing mis-triggering against generic review or PR-creation skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

qodo-ai/qodo-skills

Path

antigravity-plugins/qodo/skills/qodo-review-notes/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.