CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

x-mindful

Use BEFORE implementation when AI has produced a plan, spec, design doc, PRD, or code-bearing proposal and you want a senior-engineer architect-review pass — walks the user through the decisions, tradeoffs, assumptions, blind spots, shape mismatches, and future-debt AI silently embedded. Surfaces "what AI did, what it picked over alternatives, what it took on, and what gets harder later" one item at a time with confirm / modify / reject / skip gates. Hard-blocks code-level details so the human stays at architectural direction.

64

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

x-mindful — Architect-Review Walkthrough for AI-Generated Work

x-mindful is a gate, not an executor. AI is now fast and cheap at producing plans, specs, and code. What it misses is the senior-engineer instinct: the bigger picture, the tradeoffs it silently picked, the assumptions it embedded, the blind spots, the overengineering and underengineering, the future-debt that will haunt you in 6-12 months.

x-mindful walks the user through an AI-generated plan / spec / design doc / proposed feature at architect-review level — never code-level. It extracts what AI decided, what alternatives it didn't surface, what assumptions it baked in, what a senior would expect that's missing, and what gets harder later. It ranks those items by severity × blast-radius × reversibility, drops anything below the "would a senior want to weigh in?" threshold, then walks the user through the survivors one at a time with a confirm / modify / reject / skip gate. The output is a decision envelope the next skill (typically x-do Mode A) consumes.

This skill is the inverse of x-review: x-review judges work after the fact; x-mindful gates work before it starts. It is also the inverse of x-guide: x-guide teaches; x-mindful warns.

What x-mindful Surfaces (the taxonomy)

CategoryWhat it surfaces
TRADEOFFA fork in the road. AI picked side X without naming the cost on the other axis (sync vs async, monolith vs split, build vs buy, vendor-specific vs portable, one-way vs two-way door).
ASSUMPTIONA load-bearing claim AI silently relied on (scale, NFRs, environment, human capacity, trust boundaries).
BLIND-SPOTWhat's NOT in the plan that a senior expects (failure modes, rollback, observability, runbook, owner, threat model, migration safety).
SHAPEThe solution shape doesn't fit the constraints. Either over-engineered (modular mirage, premature abstraction, microservice for a tiny domain) or under-engineered (missing idempotency, retries, observability, dead-letter handling).
FUTURE-DEBTWhat gets harder later — paints-into-corner choices, deep vendor coupling, cost curves that grow with usage, org-fit assumptions that won't hold.

Hard rule: items are presented at architect level. No function names, parameter lists, field names, file paths, or variable identifiers in any narrative field. AI follows common best practice when picking those — the human reviews direction, not implementation. The extractor (Step 02) drops or re-casts code-level findings.

Bootstrap (MANDATORY)

Before any phase, load:

  1. ../x-shared/capability-loading.md — pin the active capability set for this session. Trust the bootstrap-pinned set; do not re-verify per dispatch.
  2. gotchas.md — known failure patterns. Read once at start.
  3. Memory recall (only when mcp.agentmemory pinned in bootstrap-active set): one mcp__plugin_agentmemory_agentmemory__memory_recall({ query: "<plan-slug + architectural keywords>", token_budget: 1500 }) call. Surface prior architectural lessons relevant to this plan as context for the extraction phase — leads, not verdicts. When mcp.agentmemory is not pinned, skip silently — Claude's native auto-memory file still applies.

Lazy-load only when the phase needs it:

  • references/extraction-prompts.md — when Phase 2 dispatches extraction.
  • references/severity-rubric.md — when Phase 3 ranks items.
  • references/walkthrough-menu.md — when Phase 4 enters the gate loop.
  • references/item-schema.md — when emitting / consuming items.
  • ../x-omo/SKILL.md — only if Phase 2 routes to OMO agents (oracle, --model codex).

Impact Tool Preference

When mcp.gitnexus is pinned in the bootstrap-active set, prefer the GitNexus impact MCP tool over heuristic ranking when scoring blast-radius for TRADEOFF and BLIND-SPOT items that touch existing symbols. The graph-derived blast radius (depth 1 = WILL BREAK, depth 2 = LIKELY AFFECTED) informs the scope_note and the surface field; the categorical narrative still comes from the extraction prompts. ASSUMPTION, SHAPE, and FUTURE-DEBT items are judgment calls about the plan itself — gitnexus impact doesn't help there.

When the capability is NOT pinned, fall back to the existing extraction + scoring pipeline. Either way, surface the chosen path inline (e.g., Impact source: gitnexus.impact or Impact source: heuristic ranking) so the user can audit the routing decision.

Anti-Triggers

Route elsewhere and stop if the request is closer to:

User intentRoute to
"Review this code / PR / diff" (judging existing work)x-review
"Walk me through and teach me this doc" (comprehension)x-guide
"Investigate / find how X works" (open research)x-research
"Just build it" with no plan content providedx-do (it will gather requirements)
"Audit / improve this skill itself"x-skill-review / x-skill-improve
"Pick names / refactor names / clean up code"x-do Mode E or refactor skill

When x-mindful Triggers

Manual: user invokes /x-skills:x-mindful (or phrases like "be mindful about this plan", "what could break", "walk me through the impacts before we build", "what tradeoffs did AI silently pick", "architect-review this plan", "what assumptions is this making", "what gets harder later").

Auto-gate from x-do Mode A: x-do invokes x-mindful before plan execution when the plan content matches any of these architect-level signals (broader than v1):

  • Tradeoff signals: async, event-driven, message bus, queue, outbox, CDC, microservice, split, monolith, serverless, lambda, kafka, kinesis, sqs, CQRS, event sourcing, hexagonal, saga, dual-write, sync vs async, eventual consistency, strong consistency
  • Boundary / contract signals: breaking change, deprecate, remove, rename, replace …with, migrate, migration, schema change, drop column, drop table, BC break, incompatible, public API, shared library, published, consumer, feature flag rollout, traffic split, canary
  • Trust / security signals: auth, authn, authz, permission, RBAC, RLS, session, token, secret, CORS, CSRF, public endpoint, tenant, multi-tenant, audit log, threat model
  • Operational / cost signals: index, full scan, backfill, N+1, fan-out, cron, scheduled job, SLO, SLA, on-call, runbook, pager, observability, metrics, tracing, cost, quota, rate limit, vendor, lock-in, region, multi-region
  • Architectural-decision keywords: architecture, design doc, RFC, PRD, spec, proposal, pattern, tradeoff, alternative, rationale

x-do may skip the gate when ALL of: scope is single-file, no shared interface touched, plan has < 3 tasks, none of the above signals appear, AND no public surface / data-layer touched. In that case x-do continues directly.

Phase Dispatch

x-mindful runs five phases in order. Each phase has a step file under steps/. Read the step file for that phase before executing it.

PhaseStep filePurpose
1steps/step-01-detect.mdLocate plan content (file vs. paste vs. handoff envelope), classify size, refuse if no content
2steps/step-02-extract.mdScan content for TRADEOFF / ASSUMPTION / BLIND-SPOT / SHAPE / FUTURE-DEBT items; hard-block code-level findings; route to claude-direct, gemini, oracle, or --model codex based on size + capability set
3steps/step-03-rank.mdApply senior_weigh_in filter, score remaining items by severity × surface × reversibility, produce ordered queue
4steps/step-04-walkthrough.mdRender the "Plan at Architect Level" opener, then loop one item at a time: confirm / modify / reject / skip / quit, track decisions in-memory
5steps/step-05-handoff.mdEmit decision envelope (confirmed / modified / rejected / skipped) for x-do or for direct user use; offer next-skill chain

Phase 4 is the core loop. Phases 1-3 and 5 are linear.

State (in-memory, transient)

x-mindful does not write a .x-mindful/ directory by default. All state lives in the active session:

  • Extracted items list (Phase 2 → Phase 3 → Phase 4)
  • Ranked queue (Phase 3, after senior_weigh_in filter)
  • Decisions map: { item_id → confirm | modify | reject | skip } plus the modification text when modify (Phase 4)
  • Final envelope (Phase 5)

Reasons for transient: most plans are reviewed once, immediately before x-do execution. The decision envelope lives in the x-do handoff context for the rest of the session. If the user asks to persist (e.g., "save this for later"), drop the envelope into .x-mindful/<slug>/IMPACTS.md as a one-shot export — but do not maintain progress.json across sessions. Always offer a final markdown summary the user can copy.

Output Contract — Decision Envelope

Phase 5 emits the following block (Markdown, copy-paste safe). x-do Mode A reads x-mindful-envelope v1 for backward compatibility; the new taxonomy v2 is signaled by the item id prefixes and the taxonomy: v2 marker. The section layout (Confirmed / Modified / Rejected / Skipped / Pending) is unchanged so existing consumers keep working.

<!-- x-mindful-envelope v1 -->
<!-- taxonomy: v2 (TRADEOFF / ASSUMPTION / BLIND-SPOT / SHAPE / FUTURE-DEBT) -->
**Source:** <path-or-paste-id>
**Items reviewed:** N (C confirmed / M modified / R rejected / S skipped)

### Confirmed (proceed as written)
- [TRADEOFF-001] Adopt event-driven inventory propagation — severity: HIGH
- [BLIND-SPOT-002] Add threat model for the new public endpoint — severity: CRITICAL

### Modified (revise plan before executing)
- [BLIND-SPOT-001] Break a public function-call contract
  - **Original plan:** rename in one shot, all callers updated in same PR
  - **User direction:** add deprecation alias for two releases, then remove

### Rejected (drop from plan)
- [SHAPE-002] Add Redis cache for product list
  - **Reason:** out of scope this sprint

### Skipped (revisit later)
- [FUTURE-DEBT-001] Hardcode single-region routing
<!-- /x-mindful-envelope -->

x-do Mode A MUST honor this envelope: confirmed items proceed, modified items revise the plan first, rejected items are removed, skipped items go on a follow-up list.

References

  • references/item-schema.md — extracted-item shape, required fields, hard-rule against code-level details
  • references/extraction-prompts.md — per-category extraction prompts (TRADEOFF / ASSUMPTION / BLIND-SPOT / SHAPE / FUTURE-DEBT)
  • references/severity-rubric.md — scoring formula, category exemplars, senior_weigh_in filter
  • references/walkthrough-menu.md — Phase 4 opener ("Plan at Architect Level"), per-item render template, menu commands
  • gotchas.md — known failure patterns

Completion (MANDATORY)

Before claiming done, resolve the verifier slot per ../x-shared/slot-schema.md:

  1. User in-prompt override? ("skip verification") → wins.
  2. Skill frontmatter slots: block (this skill declares verifier: x-verify).
  3. Schema default — only if 1 and 2 silent.

Surface inline before dispatch, e.g. Dispatching verifier slot → resolved to x-verify via skill frontmatter. Then dispatch via the Skill tool.

x-mindful's "done" is narrow: every queued item has a decision (confirm / modify / reject / skip), the envelope is rendered, and the user has either chosen a next skill or explicitly stopped. x-verify confirms that envelope state, not implementation correctness — there is no implementation here.

Dependencies

  • ../x-shared/capability-loading.md — capability pinning
  • ../x-shared/slot-schema.md — slot precedence
  • ../x-shared/severity-guide.md — shared severity scale (CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW)
  • ../x-shared/context-envelope.md — handoff format
  • ../x-shared/invocation-guide.md — tool invocation patterns
  • Optional: ../x-omo/SKILL.md — OMO agents for large-spec extraction
  • Optional: ../x-gemini/SKILL.md — gemini ingest for very large specs

After This Skill

Decisions made → typically chain into /x-do Mode A (execute the revised plan) or stop here if many items rejected. Include a handoff envelope per ../x-shared/context-envelope.md.

Workflow chain:

  • Plan → /x-mindful → revised plan → /x-do Mode A → /x-review → merge

If the user wants to save the envelope as a permanent artifact, write it to .x-mindful/<slug>/IMPACTS.md once. Do not silently re-create it on later runs.

Repository
quangtran88/x-skills
Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.