CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

x-skill-improve

Use when the user wants to evaluate x-skill alignment and improve a skill based on real session usage — searches Claude Code session history automatically

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/x-skill-improve/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and well-structured with real bundle files behind its references. Its two weaknesses are mild verbosity in the capability-gating paragraphs and the absence of a gated validation checkpoint for the destructive skill-editing step.

Suggestions

Tighten the bootstrap and basic-memory gating paragraphs to the minimum needed to convey the degrade/fallback behavior, dropping redundant explanation of what the gating mechanism does.

Add an explicit validate-before-done checkpoint in Applying Fixes (e.g., re-read the edited file and confirm the change parses/renders) rather than only offering optional post-hoc validation via /x-skill-review.

Reference the existing references/search-patterns.md from the body or remove it, so every bundle file is either signposted or pruned.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with tables, short sections, and deferred detail, but the bootstrap, memory-recall, and basic-memory gating paragraphs are verbose relative to the concrete guidance they add and could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable guidance — concrete slash-command examples, real MCP tool-call signatures, a JSONL fallback path, an exact log-line JSON shape, and shell commands for skill-path resolution — copy-paste ready rather than pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The five-step sequence is clear with status and severity tables and an end-of-process handoff, but editing skill source files is a destructive operation whose only verification is an optional post-hoc offer rather than a gated validate-before-proceeding checkpoint, capping it per the destructive-ops guideline.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (argument-parsing.md, session-discovery.md, analysis-rubric.md, output-template.md, gotchas.md) that exist as real files, and content is appropriately split rather than inlined.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

85%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and distinctive, with an explicit Use-when trigger. Its only weakness is trigger-term naturalness: it relies on the jargony "x-skill alignment" instead of phrasings a user would naturally say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — "evaluate x-skill alignment", "improve a skill based on real session usage", "searches Claude Code session history automatically" — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor rather than the domain-plus-some-actions level.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (evaluate alignment, improve skill, search session history) and when ("Use when the user wants to evaluate x-skill alignment and improve a skill based on real session usage"), matching the explicit-trigger anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes a usable "Use when the user wants to..." trigger, but leans on the technical phrase "x-skill alignment" rather than the more natural phrasings users would say, so it has relevant keywords with missing common variations.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — session-usage-based skill alignment analysis — with a distinctive trigger unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
quangtran88/x-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.