CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

bump-tantivy

Bump tantivy to the latest commit on main branch, fix compilation issues, and open a PR

79

4.71x
Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

4.71x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/bump-tantivy/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description reads like a one-time task instruction rather than a reusable skill description. It is highly specific to tantivy which gives it distinctiveness, but it lacks a 'Use when...' clause, uses imperative voice rather than third person, and doesn't describe the skill's general capabilities in a way that would help Claude select it appropriately from a list of skills.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person descriptive voice (e.g., 'Bumps the tantivy dependency to the latest commit, resolves compilation issues, and opens a pull request') instead of imperative.

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause such as 'Use when the user asks to update tantivy, upgrade the search library dependency, or fix tantivy-related build errors.'

Include broader trigger terms users might naturally say, such as 'update dependency', 'upgrade tantivy', 'search library', 'build errors', or 'pull request'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names specific actions (bump tantivy, fix compilation issues, open a PR) and a specific domain (tantivy dependency management), but reads more like a one-time task description than a reusable skill's capability list.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what to do but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, and the 'what' reads like a single task instruction rather than a skill description. Missing 'when' caps this at 2, but the 'what' is also weak as a skill description, bringing it to 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant keywords like 'tantivy', 'bump', 'compilation', and 'PR', but these are narrow and the description lacks common variations or broader terms a user might say (e.g., 'update dependency', 'upgrade', 'pull request').

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Very specific to the tantivy library, making it highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills. The niche is extremely narrow.

3 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Implementation

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill that provides a clear, actionable, multi-step workflow for bumping a dependency. It includes appropriate validation checkpoints (branch check, cargo check loop), concrete commands throughout, and good decision-making guidance for handling compilation errors. The content is concise and respects Claude's intelligence without over-explaining.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is lean and efficient. Every step provides only the necessary command or instruction without explaining what git, cargo, or GitHub CLI are. No unnecessary padding or concept explanations.

3 / 3

Actionability

Each step provides specific, executable commands (gh api, cargo check, make fmt, gh pr create) with concrete examples like the Cargo.toml line format and branch naming convention. The guidance is copy-paste ready throughout.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 10-step sequence is clearly ordered with logical dependencies. Step 5 includes an explicit feedback loop (repeat cargo check until it passes) with decision criteria for when to fix autonomously vs. ask the user. Step 1 includes a validation checkpoint (abort if not on main).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a single-purpose skill under 100 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sequential steps. Each step is a concise, scannable section. No external files are needed given the scope.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
quickwit-oss/quickwit
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.