Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable audit methodology with concrete tools, keyboard tests, and thresholds, supported by three real one-level reference files. The main weakness is mild verbosity from restating WCAG criteria inline that duplicates the quick-reference file.
Suggestions
Trim the four-principles section: replace the principle definition lines Claude already knows with direct audit checks, and defer full criteria to references/wcag-quick-reference.md.
Add one or two runnable commands for the named CLI tools (e.g., a sample `pa11y` invocation) to lift actionability from mostly-executable to copy-paste-ready.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., re-scan after remediation to confirm each P0/P1 finding is resolved) to close the validate-fix-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and well-structured, but the four-principles section restates WCAG criteria definitions Claude already knows (e.g., 'Information and UI must be presentable in ways users can perceive') and duplicates detail likely present in references/wcag-quick-reference.md, so it could be tightened; fits the 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' anchor rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and specific—names tools (axe DevTools, Lighthouse, WAVE, Pa11y), exact keyboard keys (Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, Space, arrows, Escape), screen reader combos, and measurable thresholds (4.5:1, 200% zoom, 320px)—but tool names appear without runnable commands, a minor gap keeping it at 'mostly executable guidance' rather than copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step sequenced workflow with a built-in feedback checkpoint via the data-availability rule ('state the gap') and the 'If required data is unavailable' section, but it lacks an explicit validate-then-fix-retry loop; fits 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a dedicated Reference files section pointing to three real one-level-deep files (audit-report-template.md, wcag-quick-reference.md, aria-patterns.md), but inline WCAG criteria detail overlaps the quick-reference file, a minor organization gap keeping it just below the 'appropriately split' 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |