CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

brand-ideation

Generate, evaluate, and narrow brand concepts during early ideation including positioning territories, naming candidates, mood directions, and narrative angles. Use this skill whenever the user is in the early phase of brand creation, exploring brand directions, brainstorming names, building moodboards, generating positioning options, or trying to choose between multiple brand directions. Triggers on brand ideation, brand concept, naming, brand name, name candidates, positioning, brand positioning, mood board, brand directions, exploring brands, early brand work, brand exploration, brand brainstorm, brand options. Also triggers when the user has multiple half-formed brand ideas and needs help converging on one, even if they do not say 'ideation' explicitly.

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is brand-ideation in rampstackco/claude-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A strong instruction-only skill body: a clearly staged diverge-then-converge framework with specific counts, filters, worked examples, failure patterns, and a real, well-integrated reference bundle. Weaknesses are minor — a few throat-clearing sentences, slight duplication of the reference rubric's summary line, and no explicit recovery path when candidate names fail filters.

Suggestions

Remove the lines that add no instruction ('Names cluster by approach', 'Every brand has a story') and drop the duplicated six-criteria summary sentence, pointing instead to references/naming-evaluation-rubric.md.

Add a short fallback in the Workflow for when all naming candidates fail the six-criteria filter (e.g., 'expand to other naming approaches or relax stretchability'), making the filter checkpoint a true feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely efficient domain methodology Claude cannot reproduce (specific counts, named filters, an approach table), but contains a few trimmable lines ('Names cluster by approach', 'Every brand has a story') and duplicates the six-criteria summary sentence verbatim from references/naming-evaluation-rubric.md; this fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact quantities (3-5 territories, 8-15 candidates per direction, 2-4 mood directions), six named naming filters, a good/bad mood-direction example pair, defined narrative shapes, and a fillable output template in the bundle; it does not rely on vague direction.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with an input gate ('If the audience is unclear, run brand-discovery first') and an explicit six-criteria filter checkpoint, but there is no error-recovery/retry loop (e.g., what to do when all naming candidates fail availability); this matches 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than the full feedback-loop anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body serves as a well-structured overview with two clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (ideation-output-template.md, naming-evaluation-rubric.md), both of which exist in the bundle, each annotated with its purpose and linked at the point of use in the Workflow; the split of criteria summary in-body and detail in the reference is appropriate.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An excellent description: third-person, concrete about both capabilities and the four deliverable types, with an explicit 'Use this skill when...' clause and a dense list of natural trigger phrases plus a trigger for users who never say 'ideation'. The only weakness is slight overlap risk with sibling brand skills via broad terms like 'positioning' and 'naming'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions ('Generate, evaluate, and narrow brand concepts') and enumerates the specific deliverable types (positioning territories, naming candidates, mood directions, narrative angles) with comprehensive coverage; it matches the top anchor and does not fall to the 'minor gaps' anchor below.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' (generate, evaluate, and narrow brand concepts including the four listed output types) and 'when' ('Use this skill whenever the user is in the early phase of brand creation...') with concrete trigger phrases, exactly matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes an extensive list of natural user phrases ('brand ideation, brand concept, naming, brand name, name candidates, positioning, mood board, brand brainstorm') plus a convergence catch-all ('multiple half-formed brand ideas... even if they do not say "ideation" explicitly'), giving comprehensive synonym coverage; nothing suggests a missing common variation.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description carves a clear niche (early-phase brand creation before identity work) with distinct triggers, but terms like 'positioning' and 'naming' carry minor overlap risk with adjacent brand-family skills (e.g., brand-discovery, brand-voice); it fits 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' better than the minimal-conflict anchor above.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rampstackco/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.