Generate, evaluate, and narrow brand concepts during early ideation including positioning territories, naming candidates, mood directions, and narrative angles. Use this skill whenever the user is in the early phase of brand creation, exploring brand directions, brainstorming names, building moodboards, generating positioning options, or trying to choose between multiple brand directions. Triggers on brand ideation, brand concept, naming, brand name, name candidates, positioning, brand positioning, mood board, brand directions, exploring brands, early brand work, brand exploration, brand brainstorm, brand options. Also triggers when the user has multiple half-formed brand ideas and needs help converging on one, even if they do not say 'ideation' explicitly.
72
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific concrete actions, comprehensive trigger terms covering natural user language, explicit 'what' and 'when' guidance, and a clearly scoped niche focused on early-phase brand ideation. The inclusion of an edge case ('multiple half-formed brand ideas... even if they do not say ideation explicitly') is a thoughtful addition that improves recall.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'generate, evaluate, and narrow brand concepts,' 'positioning territories, naming candidates, mood directions, and narrative angles.' These are concrete, domain-specific deliverables. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (generate, evaluate, narrow brand concepts including positioning, naming, mood directions, narrative angles) and 'when' (early phase of brand creation, exploring directions, brainstorming names, etc.) with an explicit 'Use this skill whenever...' clause and a detailed triggers list. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms including 'brand ideation,' 'brand name,' 'name candidates,' 'positioning,' 'mood board,' 'brand brainstorm,' 'brand exploration,' and even addresses implicit triggers like 'multiple half-formed brand ideas.' These are terms users would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to early-phase brand ideation, distinguishing it from later-stage brand work like brand guidelines, visual identity systems, or brand strategy execution. The emphasis on 'early ideation,' 'exploring,' 'brainstorming,' and 'converging' creates a distinct niche. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong instructional skill with excellent workflow clarity and actionability. The 4-stage framework with specific deliverables, quantities, and filtering criteria gives Claude precise guidance for brand ideation work. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (some explanatory content Claude doesn't need, like defining what a positioning territory is) and incomplete progressive disclosure (referenced bundle files are missing, and the main file could offload some reference material).
Suggestions
Trim explanatory framing that Claude already understands (e.g., 'A positioning territory is the strategic space the brand occupies' — just show the format and angles directly).
Provide the referenced bundle files (references/ideation-output-template.md and references/naming-evaluation-rubric.md) so the progressive disclosure structure actually works, and consider moving the naming approaches table and narrative shapes into reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is generally well-written but includes some content Claude already knows (e.g., explaining what a positioning territory is, listing well-known brand name examples like 'General Electric,' 'Disney,' 'Apple'). The naming approaches table and narrative shapes are useful frameworks but could be more compressed. Some sections like 'Failure patterns' repeat guidance already implicit in the framework. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides highly concrete, specific guidance: exact numbers of candidates to generate (30-50 names, 3-5 territories), specific filtering criteria (6-point naming check), structured output formats for each stage, and clear templates for positioning territories (statement, proof, rejection, risk). This is an instruction-only skill that achieves strong actionability through specificity rather than code. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit convergence checkpoints (pick 1-2 territories before naming, filter candidates before short-listing, converge at step 7). Each stage has a diverge-then-converge structure. The failure patterns section serves as a validation checklist, and the workflow enforces ordering constraints (e.g., 'naming before positioning' is flagged as an anti-pattern). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references two external files (ideation-output-template.md and naming-evaluation-rubric.md) which is good progressive disclosure design, but neither file is provided in the bundle. The main SKILL.md is quite long (~180 lines of substantive content) and some sections like the naming approaches table and narrative shapes could potentially be moved to reference files. The 'when to use/not use' section with cross-references to other skills is well done. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
8e70d03
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.