Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill: explicit frameworks, counts, and per-item schemas drive concrete output, with a clear sequenced workflow and clean one-level-deep references. Only minor conciseness trims are warranted.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence (no padding about what a brand is), with necessary domain-term definitions and pedagogically useful good/bad contrasts, but a few illustrative asides and the time-sensitive Sprint/T-Mobile parenthetical could be trimmed, so it sits just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction skill: explicit counts (3-5 territories, 8-15 names per direction, 30-50 candidates filtered to 8-12), structured frameworks (6 positioning angles, 8 naming approaches, 6 filters, 6 narrative shapes), and a per-item write schema make the output fully specified. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step numbered workflow sequences the four stages with explicit checkpoints (six-criteria naming filter, convergence/decision step) and a gap-stating protocol for unavailable data; the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply to divergent ideation, and checklists/feedback loops are present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with clear section headers and two verified one-level-deep references (ideation-output-template.md, naming-evaluation-rubric.md) that are clearly signaled both inline in the workflow and in a dedicated Reference files section; detail is appropriately offloaded. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |