Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable design skill with a clear sequenced workflow and good progressive disclosure via real reference files; minor conciseness and example-density gaps keep it from full marks.
Suggestions
Tighten editorial asides like 'A color system is more than a palette. It is the rules for how color carries meaning.' into the bullet list that follows them.
Add one short worked example per element (e.g., a sample type-scale table or a contrast-pass/fail color pair) to lift actionability toward copy-paste-ready.
Add an explicit 'if the stress-test breaks the system, return to step 3 and revise the offending element' feedback loop to the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean bullet lists with concrete thresholds; a few editorial sentences ('A color system is more than a palette. It is the rules...') could be trimmed without losing value. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance with numeric thresholds (16px, WCAG 4.5:1, 5-8 colors, ms duration scales) and explicit failure patterns; lacks worked visual examples, keeping it just below fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six-step workflow has an explicit stress-test checkpoint ('Where does it break? Iterate.') and a sign-off gate, but no error-recovery feedback loop for iteration failures. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview body with two well-signaled, one-level-deep references (identity-system-spec.md, contrast-and-accessibility.md) that are real files in references/, and content appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |