Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body with a clear sequenced workflow and clean one-level-deep reference disclosure, all referenced bundle files verified present. The main improvement opportunity is trimming motivational editorial lines and restated known concepts to improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Remove or tighten editorial lines that Claude does not need (e.g., 'Hold the line on these and most design problems disappear', 'Contrast is not a preference. It is a baseline', 'Rounded corners are a tool, not a default') to lift conciseness toward level 3.
Drop restatements of concepts Claude already knows (proximity principle, scan order) and let the concrete rules carry the point.
Resolve or annotate the external cross-skill reference brand-identity/references/contrast-and-accessibility.md so navigation does not depend on another skill's bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient (tight bullets, tables, no tutorials on what HTML/CSS or tokens are), but includes motivational editorializing Claude does not need ('Hold the line on these and most design problems disappear', 'Contrast is not a preference. It is a baseline', 'Rounded corners are a tool, not a default') and restates known concepts (proximity principle, scan order), placing it at 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the lean level-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is concrete and directly applicable with specific numeric thresholds ('minimum 64px desktop, 48px mobile', 'Touch targets: minimum 44 by 44 pixels', '4.5:1' / '3:1' contrast table, 'Test on a 375 to 390 pixel viewport'), meeting the instruction-only bar of concrete specific guidance; the absence of in-body code is justified ('Stack-specific patterns live in reference files') and not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Every text-on-background combination passes AA', 'Confirm nothing breaks', 'Run the pre-ship checklist') and a checklist reference for feedback, matching the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor rather than the validation-gaps level-2 anchor; this is design review rather than destructive ops, so the feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (design-tokens-template.md, preship-checklist.md, tailwind-patterns.md — all verified to exist) and a dedicated 'Reference files' section, matching the clear-overview-with-one-level-deep-references anchor; the single external cross-skill reference (brand-identity/references/contrast-and-accessibility.md) is a minor navigation note, not deep nesting. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |