CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

dispatch-authoring

Write the structured handoff from a planning session to a coding agent: a dispatch with a header, Gate 0 checks, scope, specification, verification, delivery rules, and stop conditions, so the agent can execute unattended and return a reviewable draft PR. Use this skill whenever the user wants to hand work to an agent, write an agent brief, write instructions for Claude Code, Codex, or a Cursor agent, queue work to run overnight, or turn a plan into something an AI coder can execute without asking questions. Triggers on dispatch, hand off to an agent, agent brief, agent handoff, task brief for an AI coder, instructions for Claude Code, Codex task, Cursor agent, background agent, run this overnight, give this to an agent, unattended run. Also triggers when the user has a plan or a spec and asks how to get an agent to build it, even if they never say dispatch.

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instruction-only skill: the workflow is clearly sequenced with real validation checkpoints, and progressive disclosure is exemplary — a lean overview pointing to four well-described, one-level-deep reference files. The main costs are cross-section repetition of a few core rules and the absence of any inline example fragment to ground the abstract seven-part framework.

Suggestions

State the never-merge rule once (e.g., in Principles) and have the Delivery section and Failure patterns reference it instead of restating it, trimming roughly a paragraph of repetition.

Inline one short filled example of a header and one Gate 0 check line (2-4 lines total) so the seven-part framework is grounded without opening references.

Consider narrowing the broadest trigger phrases in the description ("background agent", "run this overnight") to dispatch-specific phrasings to reduce overlap with agent-orchestration skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a PR, worktree, or verification is — and every section adds non-obvious guidance. However, core rules are restated across sections: the never-merge rule appears three times ("The agent never merges", "It never merges", "Permission to merge"), and the derive-counts and one-worktree rules each appear twice in Principles and Failure patterns. This is efficient with minor trimmable repetition, fitting anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable for an authoring task: a 9-step workflow, an exact output filename convention ("dispatch-[short-name]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md"), and specific directives like "Point at the source spec instead of pasting it" and "Ask for the output to be pasted, not summarized". It stops short of anchor 5 because the body shows no inline fragment of any dispatch part (header, Gate 0 check) — all examples are deferred to the reference files — leaving minor gaps if the references are not opened.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: step 1 gates readiness ("If you do not know how the work will be verified, stop and find out") and step 8 is a review-as-the-agent feedback loop ("Find every place you would have to ask a question. Answer it... or turn it into a stop condition"), reinforced by the Gate 0 checklist reference. This matches anchor 5's clear sequence, explicit validation, and feedback loops for error recovery.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a genuine overview (framework, workflow, failure patterns) with all detail split into four reference files that each carry a one-line description of when to use them, linked both inline at the point of use in the workflow and again in a dedicated Reference files section. All four referenced files exist and contain no nested references, so navigation is one level deep and easy — a clear anchor-5 match. (The unreferenced _claude-frontmatter-extras.yaml is a porting artifact, not skill content.)

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An excellent description: it states the full deliverable structure explicitly, provides an unusually thorough set of natural trigger phrases including tool names, and covers both what and when with concrete triggers. The only weakness is that several broad agent phrases could collide with general agent-orchestration skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and enumerates the concrete deliverable comprehensively: "a dispatch with a header, Gate 0 checks, scope, specification, verification, delivery rules, and stop conditions, so the agent can execute unattended and return a reviewable draft PR". All seven output components plus the draft-PR outcome are explicitly listed, matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor at 4.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both questions are explicitly answered: what ("Write the structured handoff... a dispatch with a header, Gate 0 checks, scope, specification, verification, delivery rules, and stop conditions") and when ("Use this skill whenever the user wants to hand work to an agent... Triggers on dispatch... Also triggers when the user has a plan or a spec"). Concrete trigger phrases make this a clear anchor-5 match, not the softer 'when' of anchor 4.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger list is comprehensive and natural: "dispatch, hand off to an agent, agent brief, agent handoff, task brief for an AI coder, instructions for Claude Code, Codex task, Cursor agent, background agent, run this overnight, give this to an agent, unattended run", plus tool-specific synonyms and an implicit-trigger case. This matches the anchor for comprehensive natural-term coverage including synonyms.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The core niche (planner-to-agent dispatch authoring) and triggers like "dispatch" and "agent brief" are distinct, but broader phrases such as "background agent", "run this overnight", and "give this to an agent" overlap with general agent-orchestration and scheduling skills. This is mostly distinct with minor overlap risk against closely related skills, fitting anchor 4 rather than the minimal-conflict anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

rampstackco/claude-skills

Path

dist/codex/.agents/skills/dispatch-authoring/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.