CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

launch-runbook

Plan and execute a launch runbook covering pre-launch verification, go-live procedures, DNS cutover, post-launch monitoring, and rollback procedures. Use this skill whenever the user is preparing to launch a website or product, planning a DNS cutover, building a go-live checklist, or executing a launch day. Triggers on launch runbook, go-live, launch day, DNS cutover, deploy to production, site launch, product launch, cutover plan, launch checklist, deployment procedure. Also triggers when a launch is approaching and the team needs structured coordination, even if 'runbook' is not explicitly stated.

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, stack-agnostic runbook framework with strong sequencing, explicit validation checkpoints, and rollback feedback loops, backed by a single well-signaled fillable template reference. The main improvement areas are trimming editorial asides and replacing placeholder thresholds (X percent / Y percent) with at least one worked example inline.

Suggestions

Trim editorial one-liners (e.g., "Untested rollback is hope, not procedure", "Ambiguity here is the most common cause of launch chaos") that restate common sense, to reduce token cost without losing guidance.

Include one worked example with concrete values inline (e.g., "Error rate > 2x baseline for 10 minutes → automatic rollback") instead of only 'X percent'/'Y percent' placeholders.

Reduce duplication between the framework's cutover steps and the output-format section by pointing to the template's step structure rather than restating it.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and structured with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but a few editorial one-liners ("Untested rollback is hope, not procedure", "Ambiguity here is the most common cause of launch chaos") and some duplication between the framework section and the output-format section could be trimmed. This fits anchor 4 ('minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed') better than anchor 5's 'every token earns its place'.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: concrete T-timelines (T-30/T-7/T-1/T-1hr), a 12-step cutover sequence, per-step required fields (owner, pre-conditions, verification, rollback), specific comms cadences, and a 10-part output structure. It falls short of anchor 5 because thresholds are left as placeholders ("Error rate exceeds X percent", "beyond Y percent") and no worked example with filled-in values appears in the body — the fillable detail is delegated to the reference template.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The four-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation after nearly every cutover step ("Verify deploy completed without errors", "Run smoke tests on production", "Verify DNS propagation"), rollback criteria defined in advance as abort feedback loops, tested-rollback and tabletop-exercise steps, and checklists for pre-launch, verification, and stabilization. This matches anchor 5 (clear sequence, explicit validation, feedback loops, checklists).

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a readable framework overview, and the one bundle file (references/runbook-template.md) is a real, well-signaled, one-level-deep reference ("Fillable runbook template with example cutover sequences") that appropriately holds the detailed fillable template and worked cutover examples. Content split and navigation match anchor 5.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capabilities, an explicit 'Use this skill whenever...' trigger clause with extensive natural trigger terms, and a clearly bounded launch-event niche. The only weakness is that a couple of trigger phrases ('deploy to production', 'deployment procedure') are broad enough to fire for routine deploys outside a launch context.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage: "Plan and execute a launch runbook covering pre-launch verification, go-live procedures, DNS cutover, post-launch monitoring, and rollback procedures." It matches the anchor-5 example pattern (multiple specific actions spanning the full domain) and uses third-person voice; it is not score 4 because there are no meaningful coverage gaps.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both "what" (plan and execute a launch runbook covering five named areas) and "when" ("Use this skill whenever the user is preparing to launch a website or product, planning a DNS cutover, building a go-live checklist, or executing a launch day") with concrete trigger phrases, exactly matching the anchor-5 example structure.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger terms are comprehensive and natural: "launch runbook, go-live, launch day, DNS cutover, deploy to production, site launch, product launch, cutover plan, launch checklist, deployment procedure," plus scenario phrasings like "preparing to launch a website or product" and "planning a DNS cutover." It includes synonyms and variations a user would actually say, matching anchor 5 rather than the 'a few natural terms missing' of anchor 4.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The launch-runbook niche is clear (go-live, DNS cutover, launch day are distinct triggers), but the broad triggers "deploy to production" and "deployment procedure" would also be said for routine deploys unrelated to a launch, creating minor overlap risk with closely related deployment skills. This fits anchor 4 ('mostly distinct; minor overlap risk') rather than anchor 5's 'minimal conflict risk'.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

rampstackco/claude-skills

Path

skills/launch-runbook/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.