Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality body: concise, actionable, with a measured and iterated workflow and clean progressive disclosure to three real reference files. It assumes Claude's competence and adds only domain-specific value (thresholds, named APIs, failure patterns).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout — targets, causes, and fixes are stated directly with no padding about what a metric is or how libraries work; not the score-2 case because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable specifics — named thresholds (LCP <2.5s, INP <200ms, CLS <0.1), real APIs (`scheduler.yield()`, `font-display: swap`, `loading="lazy"`, `import { fn } from 'lib'`), and named tools (Lighthouse, WebPageTest, CrUX) — copy-paste ready rather than abstract. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit re-measure feedback loop (implement → re-run Lighthouse/RUM → iterate), providing the validation checkpoints the rubric requires; not capped at 2 because measurement-after-fix checkpoints are present. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to three well-signaled, one-level-deep references — audit-template.md, optimization-checklist.md, optimization-playbook.md — all verified to exist, each with a one-line purpose, so content is appropriately split with easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |