CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

copilotkit-nextjs-integration

Integrate CopilotKit AI components into Next.js frontend for building agentic UIs. Enables context-aware AI agents that can read app state and trigger tools/actions. Supports custom adapters for self-hosted LLMs and multiple provider integrations.

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.github/skills/copilotkit-nextjs-integration/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable integration guide with concrete code for every core primitive. Its weaknesses are moderate verbosity from redundant capability/support sections, a workflow lacking explicit validation checkpoints for state-mutating AI actions, and a fully monolithic layout with no progressive disclosure into reference files.

Suggestions

Trim the 'Capabilities' section (it restates Quick Start content) and remove the generic 'Support' section to cut token overhead.

Split 'Real-World Patterns', 'Provider Integration', and 'Troubleshooting' into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. references/patterns.md, references/providers.md) with clear pointers from SKILL.md.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the Workflow (e.g. verify the runtime endpoint responds, confirm action parameters validate before executing state-mutating or bulk actions).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Core sections (Quick start, Configuration, Workflow) are tight and code-first, but the 'Capabilities' bullets largely restate the Quick Start ('Read App State: Expose UI state, data, and context to the AI model') and the 'Support'/'Resources' sections are generic filler. Mostly efficient with some unnecessary padding — anchor 3; not 2 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows at length.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, mostly executable guidance throughout: install command, full useCopilotReadable/useCopilotAction examples, runtime config props, and real-world patterns. Not 5 because some examples are not copy-paste ready — 'CustomLLMAdapter extends CopilotKitAdapter' lacks an import, Pattern 1 has 'parameters: [/* ... */]', and the self-hosted example is a comment-only placeholder.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The six-step Workflow (Setup Runtime → Wrap App → Share State → Define Actions → Add UI → Test & Refine) is clearly sequenced, but validation checkpoints are missing or implicit — 'Test & Refine' is vague, and state-mutating/batch action patterns (bulk 'update_deal_status') lack inline validation steps despite validation being mentioned only as a best-practice bullet. Anchor 3 fits; not 4 due to these checkpoint gaps.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and all content — patterns, provider integration, troubleshooting, API-style configuration — is inlined in a single ~390-line SKILL.md. Section headers are clear, but content that should be split into one-level-deep reference files is entirely inline; not 4 because there are no well-signaled external references at all.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid, domain-specific description that names concrete capabilities and is highly distinguishable. Its main weakness is the missing 'Use when...' trigger clause and the absence of common user synonyms like 'chat' or 'AI assistant', which cap completeness and trigger-term quality below the top anchors.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when adding AI chat or copilot functionality to a Next.js app, or when the user mentions CopilotKit, AI assistants, or agentic UIs.'

Add natural user synonyms such as 'chat interface', 'AI assistant', and 'copilot' alongside the existing technical terms.

Trim slightly buzzy phrasing like 'context-aware AI agents' in favor of one more concrete capability (e.g. sidebar/popup/headless chat UI options).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'read app state and trigger tools/actions', 'custom adapters for self-hosted LLMs', 'multiple provider integrations' — with only minor coverage gaps. Not 5 because it stops short of comprehensive and leans partly on buzz like 'agentic UIs' and 'context-aware'.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (integrate components, expose state, trigger actions, custom adapters), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines; 'when' is only weakly implied by 'for building agentic UIs'.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'CopilotKit', 'Next.js frontend', 'self-hosted LLMs', and 'provider integrations' are natural terms a user would say when needing this skill. Not 5 because common synonyms like 'chat', 'copilot', or 'AI assistant' are absent; not 3 since keyword coverage goes well beyond 'some relevant keywords'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming both 'CopilotKit' and 'Next.js frontend' carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk against generic AI-integration skills; it would not plausibly fire for the wrong skill.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

raphaelmansuy/edgequake

Path

.github/skills/copilotkit-nextjs-integration/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.