Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured single-purpose skill with concrete commands, exact paths, and a verified one-level-deep reference to the route-discovery script. Its main gap is workflow validation for a batch capture job — no step confirms screenshots/JSON were written before the index records success — plus the referenced 'template' for requests JSON is never shown or linked.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the write-out sequence, e.g. 'Before appending the capture-index line, verify desktop.png, tablet.png, and mobile.png exist and are non-empty; write ok:false and the error reason if not' — this satisfies the batch-operation validation requirement.
Include or link the template for ux_ui_map/requests/{page}.json (inline example or a references/ file) so step 3 is executable without guessing the schema.
Add a minimal Playwright spec snippet showing the viewport loop and page-ready wait, making the core capture task copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: exact paths ('edgequake_webui/playwright.config.ts', 'ux_ui_map/'), exact viewport widths (1440/768/375), and one-line run commands — no explanations of what Playwright or Next.js are. Every section earns its place; only faint padding like 'keep the process robust and deterministic' keeps it from being flawless, but it is a single short bullet, matching the anchor-5 'lean and efficient' profile. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: 'node .github/skills/playwright-ux-ui-capture/scripts/derive_routes.mjs --format json', 'cd edgequake_webui && npm run test:e2e', and a concrete capture-index JSON line. However, step 3 says 'write/update ux_ui_map/requests/{page}.json from the template' without showing or linking the template, and there is no example Playwright spec code — concrete gaps that keep it below fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear (route discovery → viewports → waiting → write-out → run → failure handling), but this is a batch operation over many routes and viewports, and there is no validation step verifying artifacts actually landed on disk before appending 'ok:true' to the capture-index. The failure section handles auth and 404 ('still write a capture-index line with ok:false'), which is partial, but the batch-validation cap applies: checkpoints for the success path are missing or implicit, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-sectioned body with exactly one bundle file, clearly signaled and one level deep: 'Helper script (no dependencies): [scripts/derive_routes.mjs](scripts/derive_routes.mjs)' — verified to exist in the bundle. Nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined, matching the anchor-5 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references'. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |