Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built instruction-only skill: concrete file paths, exact framework directives, a locating procedure, worked examples, and a completion checklist make it highly actionable with only minor gaps. Its weaknesses are mild redundancy in the Examples section, a vague build-verification step without a feedback loop, and no progressive offloading of detail into reference files.
Suggestions
Trim the Examples section to two cases that add new information (e.g., deprecation and a new option), since Examples 1 and 2 restate the File Naming and Finding-the-File rules already covered.
Replace "Verified documentation builds correctly (if applicable)" with the actual build/verification command, and add a brief fix-and-revalidate loop (run build → fix broken MDX/frontmatter → re-run) after documentation edits.
Include one short, complete sample API doc page (frontmatter + description + example + parameters) so the documented six-part format is shown, not just described; optionally move the React/Vue directive list into a reference file to shorten the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and project-specific ("Never copy a page to make a Vue version", "Examples never import `@data-client/core`") with no generic-concept padding, so it clears level 3. It falls short of level 5 because the Examples section (Examples 1-4) largely restates rules already given in "Documentation File Naming" and "Finding the Right Documentation File", and a few checklist bullets could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete throughout: exact file mappings ("`useSuspense.ts` → `docs/core/api/useSuspense.md`"), exact directives (":::react", "framework-imports"), and a copy-paste frontmatter template. It is not level 5 because of minor gaps: "Verified documentation builds correctly (if applicable)" names no command, and no complete sample API doc is shown for the documented format. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence exists ("Finding the Right Documentation File": identify package → check exports → match name → check guides) plus a 9-item pre-completion checklist, so this is above level 3. Validation is present but weak and one-directional ("Verified documentation builds correctly (if applicable)") with no fix-and-retry feedback loop, which keeps it at level 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so scoring rests on the single-file structure, which is well-organized with clear section headers and clearly signaled external pointers ("See `website/framework-docs/README.md`", "website/src/components/Playground/README.md"). At ~110 lines it exceeds the simple-skill exception, and detail like the React/Vue directive list could arguably live in a reference file, placing it at level 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |