Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable reference for Conventional Commits with copy-paste examples and clear organization. Minor conciseness trim in the Best Practices section could push it higher.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The type list, format template, and examples all earn their place with little padding, though the Best Practices bullets restate concepts Claude already knows ('Explain why, not just what'), keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commit examples cover the common types, and the concrete format template plus issue-reference syntax leave no ambiguity about how to execute. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose skill with an unambiguous single action, so workflow clarity is strong; no destructive or batch operation triggers the validation cap. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (types, examples, good/bad, references) and self-contained with no bundle files, but at over 50 lines it is not a clean fit for the simple-skill 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |