Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow that names exact files and commands and includes explicit validation. Small gaps in copy-paste-ready test examples and an implicit rather than explicit fix-retry loop keep it just below the top anchors.
Suggestions
Add one complete, copy-paste-ready functional test example file (imports, beforeEach/afterEach, a sample assertion) so typing and runtime coverage steps are fully executable.
Make the validation feedback loop explicit, e.g. 'If build or tsd fails, fix the generator input, rerun node bin/index.js, then rebuild/re-run tsd before proceeding.'
Consider extracting the Command Support Map into a references file once the skill grows, to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview pointing to detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense with actionable specifics (exact paths, commands, conventions) and free of padded explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact import paths and runnable commands (node bin/index.js, npm run build, npx tsd --files ...), but typing-test coverage is given as templates (expectType<Promise<...>>) rather than full copy-paste examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step sequence with a dedicated validation step and a regenerate-after-input-changes loop, but the validate->fix->retry feedback loop is implied rather than spelled out as a retry cycle. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained with well-organized sections (Command Support Map, Workflow, Completion Report) and no nested references; no bundle files exist to split content further, so minor organization gaps remain versus a fully chunked layout. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |