Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, actionable procedural skill with executable code, exact paths, and a well-sequenced workflow. The only gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the build/verify step.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after Step 7, e.g. 'If `bun run make` fails, read the error, fix the option/config wiring, and re-run the build before proceeding.'
Turn the Step 6 docs checklist into a brief bullet checklist (CLI pages to touch, config.mdx section, id matching cliFlag) so the mandatory docs step is verifiable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and task-specific throughout — exact file paths, a complete option code block, and edge-case notes — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a full executable option definition, precise registration locations, and copy-paste-ready build commands, meeting the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step numbered sequence with an explicit 'Build and verify' checkpoint, but it lacks an error-recovery feedback loop (no 'if the build fails, fix and re-run' guidance), so it stops short of the score 3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle directories exist; the body is well-sectioned with a one-level-deep 'Reference files' list and a single signaled sibling-skill link, appropriate for an in-place skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |