Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, actionable instruction: concrete paths, a complete entry template, and the exact build/upload command with a verification checkpoint. The only meaningful gap is the absence of error-recovery guidance around the render/upload step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with zero padding: exact file paths, a single complete TSX template, field rules, and one command. It assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what Remotion, git, or PNG files are) and every line instructs an action, matching the anchor for lean and efficient content. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete and executable: exact paths for both image locations, a copy-paste-ready TSX entry template with every field, explicit field rules (slug format, null handling, since date, array position), and the exact command `bun render-cards` with the `--overwrite=experts-<slug>` variant. Placeholders like <firstname> are appropriate fill-in templates, and the common cases (new vs. existing card) are covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps are clearly sequenced (add photo, add entry, render card) with an explicit checkpoint ("Verify it says 'Uploaded'"), matching anchor 4. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do if the upload fails or the card does not render correctly) and no pre-upload validation of the entry. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; the three numbered steps with sub-bullets are well-organized sections. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, this scores 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |