Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean skill body: exact commands, a concrete default URL with fallback behavior, and well-organized sections with no token waste. The only gaps are missing validation checkpoints (confirming the dev server is ready, detecting an already-running server) that step 5 implicitly assumes.
Suggestions
Add a brief checkpoint after step 2, e.g. wait for the dev server's ready line in its output before opening the URL.
Add one line to step 5 explaining how to tell a newly started server from an already running one (e.g. check for an existing process or prior session output), since the report requirement currently has no supporting step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 28-line body is lean with zero padding: a two-line overview and a numbered workflow of commands and one-sentence instructions, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step is copy-paste ready — exact commands ("bun i && bun run build", "cd packages/convert && bun run dev"), the expected URL (http://localhost:5173) with a fallback rule for alternate Vite ports, and a concrete fallback (tool_search) for a missing browser tool. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step sequence is clear and ordered with contingencies for port changes and a missing browser tool, but there is no checkpoint for confirming the build/dev server actually succeeded before opening the URL, and step 5 asks the agent to report whether the server was "newly started or already running" without any instruction for detecting an already-running instance. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed; the Overview and Workflow sections are well-organized and the skill qualifies for the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |