Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, executable, and safety-conscious, with clear command examples and explicit verification guidance for a destructive operation. The only gap is an explicit error-recovery feedback loop for the prune workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop for the prune operation: state what to do when a relationship verification fails (fix the relationship and re-verify before continuing) so the validate→fix→retry cycle is spelled out.
Clarify the post-apply verification as a discrete step with its own command or checklist rather than a clause within the apply instructions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body that assumes Claude's competence; every line is operational detail (flags, behavior distinctions, safety warnings) rather than explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready `bun` commands covering the common cases (default, --repo, --json, --check, --root, --apply) with complete executable invocations rather than pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow with explicit validation ('verify every relationship after changing it', dry-run default, deepest-first processing, move open children first), but lacks an explicit validate→fix→re-verify feedback loop for the destructive prune operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into two clear sections with one-level-deep references to real bundled scripts (find-unplanned-issues.ts, prune-closed-masterplan-issues.ts) signaled as the primary commands; no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |