CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pr-name

Correct naming for a PR

56

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/pr-name/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a lean, well-structured, highly actionable reference for PR-title naming with concrete examples for each prefix category, appropriate for a simple single-purpose skill. Its only weakness is mild repetition that a compact mapping table could reduce.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body contains no concept-explanation fluff and assumes Claude's competence, but the eight near-identical 'If the change relates to X, use the Y prefix' blocks could be tightened into a compact condition-to-prefix table, matching the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor.

2 / 3

Actionability

It gives a concrete copy-paste format (`[package-name]: [commit-message]`) plus specific worked examples for every category (e.g. `@remotion/shapes: Add heart shape`, `Docs: Add page about heart shape`), which is fully actionable for an instruction-only skill.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-task skill; the decision logic is unambiguous — default to the affected package name, then override with a special prefix when a category matches — and no destructive/batch validation is needed, so per the simple-skills note workflow clarity earns 3.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is a simple, well-organized skill with a clear default rule and a '## Special handling' section, so per the simple-skills note progressive disclosure earns 3 on well-organized sections alone.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

40%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is terse and identifies a clear niche, but it is too abstract to be strongly specific, lacks natural trigger variations, and entirely omits a 'Use when' clause that would tell Claude when to invoke it.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when creating or renaming a pull request title, or when the user asks how to name a PR.'

List concrete actions and natural terms: 'Formats PR titles from the affected package name or special prefixes (Docs, Internal, Elements). Use when writing pull request titles, PR names, or commit-style PR prefixes.'

Include common variations of the trigger term such as 'pull request', 'PR title', and 'commit message' alongside 'PR'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description is only 'Correct naming for a PR' — it names the domain (PR) but states a single abstract action ('naming') rather than listing multiple concrete actions, matching the vague/abstract anchor more closely than the multi-action anchor.

1 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does ('Correct naming for a PR') but provides no 'Use when...' trigger or equivalent, so per the judging guideline a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'PR' is a natural term users would say, but common variations like 'pull request', 'title', or 'commit message' are missing, matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The PR-naming niche is fairly specific, but with no explicit triggers the broad 'naming' concept could still overlap with commit-message or git skills, matching the 'somewhat specific but could overlap' anchor.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
remotion-dev/remotion
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.