Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, imperative, well-sequenced workflow with pervasive explicit verification checkpoints, honest-reporting rules, and error-recovery paths, delegating depth to clearly signaled sibling skills. It is slightly repetitive around authorization caveats and inlines stacked-PR mechanics that could be split out, which keeps it just short of fully lean and perfectly partitioned.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated force-push/authorization caveats in 'Checkpoints and review' into a single rule stated once (e.g., 'never force-push, merge, or rewrite published history without explicit authorization') to remove redundant qualifiers across steps 3–5.
Move the detailed stacked-PR mechanics (steps 3–5 of 'Checkpoints and review') into a reference file or lean further on the gh-stack skill, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview.
Add a brief concrete pointer for 'capture a reproducible interaction' and 'capture a relevant performance baseline' (e.g., the exact tool, script, or measurement command to use) so those steps are self-contained instead of relying on delegation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and imperative with no concept explanations (e.g., 'use Studio before analyzing its implementation' assumes competence), but the force-push/authorization caveat is repeated across the checkpoints section ('do not invoke stack commands that force-push', 'do not use them to rewrite a published child without explicit authorization', 'Do not merge PRs or force-push without explicit authorization') and several multi-clause sentences could be tightened — minor trimming opportunities, not the padding of the level-3 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives copy-paste-ready commands ('bunx remotion studio --no-open', 'gh pr ready', 'gh pr create`/`edit', 'gh stack link') and concrete workflow enumerations ('import and preview media, arrange/trim/split clips, edit text and transforms'), but steps like 'capture a reproducible interaction' and 'Capture a relevant performance baseline' lack in-file specifics and rely on delegation to sibling skills, so it falls short of the fully self-contained level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly numbered sequences (a 7-step loop and a 5-step checkpoint procedure) with explicit validation ('Repeat the original interaction in the rebuilt UI', 'Repeat the performance measurement with a comparable project', 'inspect the staged diff') and explicit error-recovery feedback loops ('If browser execution fails, diagnose the headless setup and report any remaining verification gap', 'Report pending/failing CI honestly; do not call it green before checks finish') — matching the level-5 anchor rather than the minor-gaps level-4 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section headers and well-signaled, one-level-deep sibling-skill references ('Apply [studio-dev]... to every implementation change', 'Follow [studio-perf]... and use [react-scan] when render/commit work is relevant'), with no bundle files of its own; however the ~25 lines of stacked-PR mechanics inlined in 'Checkpoints and review' could live in a reference or in the gh-stack skill, keeping it below the cleanly-split level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |