Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean skill body: dense with earned, project-specific knowledge, concrete commands, and explicit verification checkpoints at every risky stage. The only gap is that the screenshot capture operation itself is described by parameters rather than an executable command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries non-obvious project knowledge ('building only CLI dependencies misses fonts, noise, and layout utilities', 'Empty render-delay handles alone do not establish that timeline media has finished loading') with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives exact commands (studio startup, bun install, turbo make filter, a fully specified render command) and precise parameters (1280x800 at DSF 2, 336-pixel panel, 2560x1600 pixels, frame 2025, baseline revision hash, 6s at 60fps timing). The core screenshot capture step, however, specifies framing but no executable capture command or script, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process (matching captures, historical baseline checkout, reveal construction, render, verification, upload) is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: 'inspect a screenshot before saving the final captures', 'verifying the public SHA-256 hashes', 'Preserve saved screenshots until their R2 uploads are verified', and inspecting beginning/midpoint/ending of the exported video plus lint checks. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with no inlined content that belongs in separate files; detail is appropriately delegated to sibling skills via clearly signaled, one-level-deep references (offload-r2, remotion-render, upload-r2). No bundle files are needed, so the body-level structure fully suffices. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |