Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, executable, and well-structured, but the destructive commit-and-push step lacks a verification checkpoint to confirm the changes are scoped correctly before publishing.
Suggestions
Add a validation step before commit/push: re-run the diff to confirm only the intended AvailableFrom values changed and no unrelated entries were touched.
Include a quick checkpoint to verify the computed version matches origin/main's VERSION+0.0.1 before editing files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and token-efficient with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the parenthetical version examples are minimal, justified clarifications of the increment step. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready git/rg commands with specific paths and a concrete diff-filter, rather than abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced, but the destructive 'commit and push' step lacks a validation checkpoint confirming only intended AvailableFrom values changed before publishing. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, self-contained, single-purpose skill (under 50 lines, no external references) that is well-organized into numbered steps, satisfying the simple-skill scoring note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |