Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is brief and points to the right source file, but it stops at a vague directive instead of giving concrete steps for finding and updating version references, and it carries ephemeral version info that will become stale. No validation or sectioning is present.
Suggestions
Replace 'Ensure the docs correctly reference the next version' with concrete steps, e.g. a grep/ripgrep command to find version references and how to update them.
Move the 'next version is going to be a patch version' detail out of the static body, or place it under a clearly marked current-state section so it does not silently rot.
Add a validation step that confirms the docs build or that no stale version references remain after the update.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is only a few lines and mostly lean, but it embeds the time-sensitive claim 'The next version is going to be a patch version', which the guidelines penalize because it will go stale and is not placed in a deprecated/old-patterns section. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives one concrete pointer (the version file path) but the core task is left as the vague directive 'Ensure the docs correctly reference the next version' with no commands, search steps, or code, matching the describes-rather-than-instructs anchor. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill it gets some credit, but there is no explicit sequence and no validation step for verifying that the docs were correctly updated, so it does not reach the clear-workflow level. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is short with no nested references, which is fine, but it lacks any sectioning or headers that the guideline requires for a small no-reference skill to score a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |