Conciseness

The body is a dense convention list with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token-earning example sits next to its rule. Not a 5 because of minor redundancy — 'bun render-cards.ts' appears both in the new-page checklist and again in a dedicated section, and <AvailableFrom> guidance is spread across three sections. Not a 3 because there is no padded or unnecessary explanation anywhere.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: exact frontmatter blocks, twoslash fence examples with '---cut---' and title, the exact <CompatibilityTable> prop syntax, optional-parameter do/don't pairs, and a runnable command ('cd packages/docs && bun render-cards.ts'). Common cases are covered by copy-paste examples, matching the anchor-5 pattern; the anchor-4 'minor gaps' case does not apply.

Workflow Clarity

'Adding a new page' is a clearly ordered 4-step sequence (create file, update sidebars.ts, write content, run render-cards.ts) with concrete commands. Not a 5 because there is no validation checkpoint (no verify-build/lint step after edits) and no error-recovery loop; not a 3 because the sequence is explicit and this is not a destructive or batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

Single-level, well-signaled sections with clean headers and no nested references (the only external pointer, 'See the docs-demo skill', targets a sibling skill, not a chained file). Not a 5 because at ~215 lines the detailed special-components documentation (<CompatibilityTable> props, AvailableFrom variants) is inline and could be split into a reference file; not a 3 because the structure is good and nothing is buried.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Remotion documentation') and two concrete actions ('writing and editing'), but does not enumerate several specific actions like the anchor-4 example ('Extracts text... fills forms, converts pages'). It clearly exceeds anchor 2 because the domain is named precisely and actions are concrete rather than generic.

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('Guides for writing and editing Remotion documentation') and when ('Use when adding docs pages, editing MDX files in packages/docs, or writing documentation content') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor-5 pattern. It is not a 4 because the 'when' clause is already specific and multi-trigger.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say — 'adding docs pages', 'editing MDX files in packages/docs', 'writing documentation content'. Not a 5 because some synonyms and extensions (e.g. '.mdx', 'docusaurus', 'docs' alone) are absent; not a 3 because coverage goes beyond one generic keyword with concrete repo-specific terms.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Remotion documentation' plus the repo-specific 'MDX files in packages/docs' carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk with other skills. Nothing pushes it toward the anchor-4 'minor overlap' case.