Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, token-efficient reference skill with concrete executable guidance and strong diagnostic gotchas. Its main limitation is that most detail lives inline in SKILL.md rather than being progressively disclosed into bundled reference files.
Suggestions
Move the schema→archetype mapping table and/or the six gotchas into a bundled reference file (e.g. references/decoders.md and references/gotchas.md), keeping only a concise summary and clearly signaled links in SKILL.md, to push progressive_disclosure toward a 5.
Replace the 'mcap_path' placeholder in the API snippet with a concrete example path or a one-line note on how to obtain it, making the lead snippet fully copy-paste ready.
Promote the empty-stream and missing-topic diagnostics from gotchas into a short numbered 'Diagnosing an empty stream' workflow with explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoints to lift workflow_clarity to a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and high-signal throughout: no beginner-concept padding (it never explains what MCAP or Rerun are), and every prose passage conveys non-obvious domain behavior such as the verified foxglove-on-protobuf decoder interaction. Not a 4 because there is no trimmable over-explanation. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable snippets ('McapReader(path).stream()', '.filter(content="/sensors/**")', 'Selector(".joint_positions")') and concrete verification commands, but uses placeholders like 'mcap_path' and the fix-lens section is cautionary rather than copy-paste ready, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Diagnostic flow is clear with checkpoints ('Confirm on your file: McapReader(path).stream()... read McapSchema:name and a few Chunk.format()', 'retry with decoders=None'), and ingestion is read-only so the destructive-cap does not apply. Not a 5 because the workflow is embedded in prose/gotchas rather than an explicit validate-fix-retry sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to sibling skills (rerun-chunk-processing, rerun-urdf, rerun-data-model) and an external example URL, with no nested references. Not a 5 because substantial detail (the schema→archetype table and six gotchas) is inlined rather than split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |