Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of token-efficient instruction design: a precise role framing, explicit inputs, an exact output skeleton, and three operational rules for edge cases. The only real gap is the implicit workflow ordering and the unspecified use of the revision-priority input.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~45-line body is lean with zero padding: 역할, 입력, 출력 형식, 규칙 each carry load-bearing instructions and no concept Claude already knows is explained, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides a copy-paste output template (change-summary table, 1-page summary fields, numbered risk/plan lists) and concrete rules ("[가정]" assumption tagging, unified target phrasing); minor gaps remain, e.g., how to apply the "수정 우선순위" input is never specified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Inputs, rules, and an exact output format make the single task clear and the conflict-reconciliation rules function as checkpoints, but the consolidation of deliverables 1-8 is implicitly multi-step with no explicit ordering or final consistency-verification step, so it sits at 'clear sequence, minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, requires no external references (no bundle files exist), and is organized into clean labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill condition for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |