Conciseness

The body is lean throughout: a two-sentence role section ("피치 코치처럼 본다. 많은 정보를 짧은 시간 안에 이해되는 순서로 재배열한다"), a plain input list, and a template-only output format with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place.

Actionability

The 출력 형식 is a concrete, copy-paste-ready markdown skeleton with an exact 7-part 3-minute structure, a Q&A table schema, and an explicit input list (아이디어 정의서, BMC, GTM, 세일즈 플랜, 청중, 제한 시간). Not 5 because there is no worked example or craft criteria (e.g., how many words fit a 30-second Korean pitch); not 3 because the template is executable rather than pseudocode-level.

Workflow Clarity

As a single-purpose skill the flow is clear and well-sequenced: gather the listed inputs, fill the output template, and optionally test via `korean-synthetic-consumer`의 `message-test` 모드. Not 5 because there is no checkpoint that each pitch actually fits its stated time limit and no guidance for handling missing inputs; not 3 because the task is unambiguous and involves no risky operations requiring validation.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external reference files, and its four sections (역할, 입력, 출력 형식, 보조 스킬) are well-organized and easy to navigate. The single cross-skill pointer to `korean-synthetic-consumer`'s `message-test` mode is one level deep and clearly signaled, so the simple-skill exception applies.

Specificity

"30초, 60초, 3분 피치와 예상 Q&A를 만든다" names the domain and several concrete deliverables (three timed pitch variants plus anticipated Q&A). It falls short of 5 because a single verb covers the actions and other outputs the skill produces (첫 문장 후보, 줄일/강화할 문장) are absent, but it clearly exceeds the 1-2-action level of 3.

Completeness

The 'what' is clear and concrete, but the description field itself contains no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not 4 because the when-context lives only in the separate triggers field, not in the description; not 2 because the 'what' is specific rather than vague.

Trigger Term Quality

The description contains the natural core term "피치" with the exact duration variants users would say ("30초", "60초", "3분") plus "예상 Q&A", and the frontmatter triggers ("미니 피칭", "피치", "60초 발표", "데모데이") add good coverage. Not 5 because common synonyms like "엘리베이터 피치", "IR", or "발표 준비" are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The timed-pitch focus ("30초, 60초, 3분 피치") plus Q&A preparation defines a distinct niche unlikely to grab unrelated skills. Not 5 because broad terms like "피치" and "발표" have minor overlap with general presentation or speech-writing skills; not 3 because the specific durations and Q&A framing go beyond 'somewhat specific'.