Conciseness

The ~50-line body contains zero padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows: 역할 is two sentences, 입력 is a five-item list, 출력 형식 is a pure template, and 보조 스킬 is two pointer lines. Every token earns its place, matching the lean anchor 5 rather than anchor 4 (which allows minor over-explanation).

Actionability

The output format is copy-paste ready with exact table schemas ("상품 | 가격 | 포함 내용 | 예상 매출 믹스 | 리스크"), pre-filled funnel stages ("방문/노출", "리드", "상담/체험", "결제", "유지/재구매") including an evidence-status marker "[가정]", and concrete auxiliary skill references (`korean-synthetic-consumer`'s `product-fit` and `objection-map`, `evidence-research`). For an instruction-only skill this is fully actionable guidance, not the incomplete pseudocode level of anchor 3.

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple, single-purpose, non-mutating skill and the single action (fill the given template from the listed inputs) is unambiguous, so the simple-skill exception applies. The "근거 상태" column and the 보조 스킬 verification pointers ("지불의사와 반대 논리는 ... 점검한다") function as validation checkpoints, so it exceeds anchor 4 rather than merely listing steps.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill has no bundle files and references none, and the short body is cleanly organized into four well-labeled sections (역할, 입력, 출력 형식, 보조 스킬). Under the under-50-lines/no-external-references exception, well-organized sections alone warrant anchor 5; there is no inline content that belongs in a separate file.

Specificity

The description enumerates several concrete deliverables ("수익 모델, 가격, 퍼널, 매출 목표, 세일즈 리스크를 만든다") but relies on a single uniform verb "만든다" and omits deliverables the body covers (KPIs, 가격 앵커링). It lists more than 1-2 specific items, so it sits above anchor 3 but below the comprehensive, multi-action anchor 5.

Completeness

The description clearly answers "what" (creates revenue model, pricing, funnel, sales targets, sales risks) but contains no "Use when..." clause or equivalent "when" guidance within the description text itself. Per the guideline, a missing 'when' clause caps completeness at 3; the separate frontmatter `triggers` list keeps it from being lower.

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "수익 모델", "가격", "퍼널", "매출 목표", "세일즈 리스크" are natural phrases a user needing this skill would say, giving good keyword coverage. A few natural variations (e.g., "가격 전략", "매출 계획", "가격 책정") are missing from the description field itself, keeping it below the comprehensive anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The sales-planning niche ("수익 모델, 가격, 퍼널, 매출 목표, 세일즈 리스크") is mostly distinct with clear domain triggers. Terms like "수익 모델" and "가격" carry minor overlap risk with business-model or marketing-plan skills in the same suite, so it does not reach the clear-niche anchor 5.