Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and workflow-clear, with concrete templates and an explicit TDD validation loop. Its only weakness is minor repetition that slightly undercuts conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence ("DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits."), but repeats the DRY/YAGNI/TDD/commits mantra in both the Overview and Remember sections, so it could be tightened rather than earning the fully-lean top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides exact file paths ("Modify: exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145"), complete code blocks, and exact commands with expected output ("Run: pytest ... Expected: FAIL"), making the task template copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Task Structure lays out a clear TDD sequence (write failing test → verify it fails → implement → verify it passes → commit) with explicit validation checkpoints and expected outputs, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the ~110-line skill is self-contained and organized into clearly-labeled sections (Overview, Bite-Sized Task Granularity, Plan Document Header, Task Structure, Remember, Execution Handoff), which is appropriate single-file organization. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |