Content
93%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that is lean, actionable, and well-structured. It provides concrete examples for both titles and PR bodies, includes exact CLI commands, and handles edge cases (missing template, missing gh CLI). The only minor gap is the lack of an explicit post-creation verification step in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No explanation of what a PR is, what conventional commits are conceptually, or how git works. The content is dense with actionable specifics and zero padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact commands (gh pr create with flags), concrete title examples, a complete default body template, and a realistic example body. The common actions section adds copy-paste ready commands for follow-up tasks. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with validation as step 1 (auth status, branch check, uncommitted changes). However, there's no explicit validation checkpoint after PR creation (e.g., verify the PR was created successfully, check the URL) and no feedback loop for handling creation failures beyond the error handling section. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this size and scope, the content is well-organized into logical sections (workflow, title rules, body rules, common actions, error handling) with appropriate depth. No bundle files are needed, and no content is over-inlined or buried. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |