cicd-automation-workflow-automate

You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is cleanly sectioned and concise, but its instructions are abstract rather than executable and lack concrete workflow validation checkpoints, and its single external reference points to a file that does not exist in the provided bundle. Adding concrete examples and a real, reachable reference file would most improve it.

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete, copy-paste-ready example (e.g., a minimal GitHub Actions workflow YAML or a concrete pipeline-stage skeleton) to lift actionability.

Insert explicit validation/approval checkpoints into the deployment sequence (e.g., 'Require approval before deploy; verify tests pass before promoting') to satisfy the workflow-clarity feedback-loop requirement.

Either create the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' under a standard bundle directory or remove/fix the reference so progressive disclosure navigation is real and verifiable.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is well-sectioned and mostly efficient, with only minor restating of the description in the 'Context' section; it is noticeably above the 'mostly efficient' midpoint anchor but not perfectly lean.	4 / 5
Actionability	Instructions are high-level hints ('Inventory current build, test, and deploy steps', 'Define pipeline stages with caching, artifacts, and quality gates') with no concrete code, commands, or examples, fitting the 'minimal concrete guidance' anchor.	2 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A rough sequence exists in 'Instructions', but deployment and secret-handling steps lack explicit validation checkpoints; per the rubric, missing validation for destructive/deploy operations caps workflow clarity at 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are reasonably organized and one reference is signaled ('resources/implementation-playbook.md'), but that file is not present in the bundle directories and uses a non-standard 'resources/' path, so the reference is unverified and navigation is only partially clear.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, specific domain and concrete actions but is written in second person and omits any explicit 'Use when' trigger guidance, which caps completeness and lowers specificity. Adding a concrete trigger clause and switching to third-person voice would materially raise the score.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when automating CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, or release processes').

Rewrite the description in third person (e.g., 'Designs and implements CI/CD pipelines...') to avoid the second-person specificity penalty.

Include a few synonyms/file extensions users naturally say (e.g., '.github/workflows', 'release pipelines', 'build pipelines') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain and several concrete actions ('creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes'), which would anchor at 4, but it is written in second person ('You are a workflow automation expert') which the rubric penalizes by reducing specificity by one.	3 / 5
Completeness	It clearly states what the skill does but lacks any explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, so per the rubric a missing trigger guidance caps completeness at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural trigger terms a user would say are present ('CI/CD pipelines', 'GitHub Actions workflows', 'automated development processes'), with only minor synonyms missing, fitting the 'good keyword coverage' anchor above the midpoint.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The CI/CD and GitHub Actions niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against general developer-tooling skills, matching the 'mostly distinct' anchor.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Path: skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md
Commit: 3eff4af

Reviewed: 16 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.