CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

context-driven-development

Use this skill when working with Conductor's context-driven development methodology, managing project context artifacts, or understanding the relationship between product.md, tech-stack.md, and workflow.md files.

56

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/context-driven-development/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, structured methodology guide with concrete reference material, but it is verbose for an instruction-only skill, re-explains concepts Claude already knows, and bundles everything into a single long file without progressive disclosure to deeper reference materials.

Suggestions

Trim conceptual exposition Claude already knows — collapse the Core Philosophy, Benefits, and Common Anti-Patterns sections into a few concise bullets, keeping only the operational guidance.

Split detailed material out of SKILL.md into one-level-deep reference files (e.g. artifacts reference, validation checklist, directory structure) and link to them, leaving SKILL.md as a lean overview with clear navigation.

Replace generic guidance like 'Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs' and 'Apply relevant best practices' with specific, concrete steps, and add explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoints to the verify-before-implementation workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~390-line body re-explains documentation concepts Claude already knows (Core Philosophy principles, the entire Benefits section, Common Anti-Patterns restating common sense) and could be tightened considerably, though it retains genuinely useful concrete reference material (directory structure, artifact contents, validation checklist).

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides some concrete guidance (the `/conductor:setup` command, an exact directory tree, a checkbox validation checklist, numbered update procedures), but several sections give only vague direction ('Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs', 'Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes') rather than specific executable instruction.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced (Context→Spec→Plan→Implement, Context Lifecycle, session start/end procedures) and a validation checklist exists, but checkpoints are implicit check-off style with no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the body references none, so everything — full artifact specs, directory tree, validation checklist, anti-patterns, integration guidance — lives inline in one ~390-line SKILL.md; sections are well-organized, but content that should be split into reference files is kept inline with no one-level-deep navigation.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an explicit trigger clause and a distinctive, well-scoped niche anchored by named artifacts, scoring well on completeness and distinctiveness. It is held back by abstract action verbs and narrow trigger-term coverage rather than concrete, broadly varied natural keywords.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names a concrete domain (Conductor's context-driven development) and several distinct activities ('managing project context artifacts', 'understanding the relationship between product.md, tech-stack.md, and workflow.md files'), but the verbs are abstract ('working with', 'understanding', 'managing') rather than multiple specific concrete actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ('working with... methodology, managing project context artifacts, understanding the relationship between... files') and when via an explicit 'Use this skill when...' trigger clause, satisfying both halves.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes genuinely natural terms a Conductor user would say ('context-driven development', 'product.md', 'tech-stack.md', 'workflow.md'), but coverage is narrow — a single named methodology plus a few filenames — and missing common variations, so it stops short of broad natural-term coverage.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to a named methodology ('Conductor's context-driven development') with specific artifact filenames, giving it a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.