CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

e2e-testing-patterns

Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is jbvc/e2e-testing-patterns

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, well-structured skill body with clear use/don't-use and safety sections, but the instructions stay at an abstract directive level with no executable code or validation checkpoints, and its lone external reference is a broken path. Tightening the steps and fixing the reference would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete, executable example (e.g. a Playwright locator or a CI shard command) to the Instructions so guidance is copy-paste ready rather than descriptive.

Insert a validation/verification checkpoint into the workflow (e.g. 'run the suite locally and confirm zero flaky retries before pushing') to satisfy the feedback-loop requirement for batch test runs.

Fix or remove the dangling reference: `resources/implementation-playbook.md` does not exist — either create the file (under `references/`) and point to it, or drop the Resources section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what Playwright/Cypress or E2E testing is, and every section earns its place; the only mild redundancy is the opening sentence echoing the description.

3 / 3

Actionability

The Instructions name concrete techniques ('stable selectors', 'retries, tracing, and isolation', 'parallelization and artifact capture') but provide no executable code, commands, or copy-paste examples, and concrete detail is deferred to a reference rather than shown.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A four-step sequence is present (identify journeys -> build selectors -> implement tests -> run in CI) but there are no validation/verification checkpoints, which the rubric caps at 2 for batch operations like running a test suite.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and the single reference is one level deep and clearly signaled, but it points to `resources/implementation-playbook.md`, a path that does not exist (no resources/ or bundle directory present), making it a dangling reference.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-formed description that pairs concrete tooling and actions with an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, mirroring the reference good examples. It is concise, third-person/imperative in voice, and clearly scoped to E2E testing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete tools (Playwright, Cypress) and multiple specific outcomes — 'build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment' — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor; uses imperative voice consistent with the good examples rather than first/second person.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does ('Master end-to-end testing...to build reliable test suites...') and when to use it via an explicit 'Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards' clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say — 'E2E tests', 'flaky tests', 'end-to-end testing', 'Playwright', 'Cypress' — giving good coverage of common phrasings.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (E2E testing with Playwright/Cypress) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.