CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

e2e-testing-patterns

Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.

60

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/e2e-testing-patterns/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and concise, but it stays at a high level: no executable code or commands, no validation checkpoints in the workflow, and a reference to a missing resource file. It reads more like an outline than actionable guidance.

Suggestions

Add concrete, copy-paste-ready Playwright and Cypress examples (selector strategy, retry config, tracing setup) so the Instructions are executable rather than abstract.

Insert an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., run tests, inspect failures/traces, fix selectors, re-run until green) to satisfy the batch-operation feedback-loop requirement.

Either create `resources/implementation-playbook.md` or fix the path, and render the reference as a markdown link so navigation is clearly signaled.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with no concept over-explanation, but the motivational opener and the 'Use this skill when' list partly duplicate the frontmatter description, leaving minor trimmable redundancy.

4 / 5

Actionability

The Instructions are high-level hints ('Identify critical user journeys', 'Build stable selectors', 'Implement tests with retries, tracing, and isolation') with no concrete code, commands, or Playwright/Cypress examples, so Claude lacks the specific steps to execute.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A four-step sequence is present, but there are no validation or verification checkpoints; because E2E suites are batch operations, the missing feedback loop caps this score at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the single reference `resources/implementation-playbook.md` is not clearly signaled as a link and the referenced file does not exist in the bundle, making it a dangling pointer.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states capability and trigger conditions with named tools and concrete use-when phrasing. It is distinct from sibling skills and uses appropriate third-person imperative voice.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and tools (Playwright, Cypress) plus several concrete outcomes ('build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment'), but the actions are outcome-oriented rather than discrete operations, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites...') and when ('Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say — 'E2E tests', 'flaky tests', 'testing standards', 'Playwright', 'Cypress', 'end-to-end testing' — but omits common variations like 'test automation' or 'regression tests'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (E2E testing with named tools Playwright/Cypress) with distinct triggers, giving it minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.