Use when working with error debugging multi agent review
24
13%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/error-debugging-multi-agent-review/SKILL.mdA sophisticated AI-powered code review system designed to provide comprehensive, multi-perspective analysis of software artifacts through intelligent agent coordination and specialized domain expertise.
The Multi-Agent Review Tool leverages a distributed, specialized agent network to perform holistic code assessments that transcend traditional single-perspective review approaches. By coordinating agents with distinct expertise, we generate a comprehensive evaluation that captures nuanced insights across multiple critical dimensions:
$ARGUMENTS: Target code/project for review
def route_agents(code_context):
agents = []
if is_web_application(code_context):
agents.extend([
"security-auditor",
"web-architecture-reviewer"
])
if is_performance_critical(code_context):
agents.append("performance-analyst")
return agentsclass ReviewContext:
def __init__(self, target, metadata):
self.target = target
self.metadata = metadata
self.agent_insights = {}
def update_insights(self, agent_type, insights):
self.agent_insights[agent_type] = insightsdef execute_review(review_context):
# Parallel independent agents
parallel_agents = [
"code-quality-reviewer",
"security-auditor"
]
# Sequential dependent agents
sequential_agents = [
"architecture-reviewer",
"performance-optimizer"
]def synthesize_review_insights(agent_results):
consolidated_report = {
"critical_issues": [],
"important_issues": [],
"improvement_suggestions": []
}
# Intelligent merging logic
return consolidated_reportdef resolve_conflicts(agent_insights):
conflict_resolver = ConflictResolutionEngine()
return conflict_resolver.process(agent_insights)def optimize_review_process(review_context):
return ReviewOptimizer.allocate_resources(review_context)def validate_review_quality(review_results):
quality_score = QualityScoreCalculator.compute(review_results)
return quality_score > QUALITY_THRESHOLDmulti_agent_review(
target="/path/to/project",
agents=[
{"type": "security-auditor", "weight": 0.3},
{"type": "architecture-reviewer", "weight": 0.3},
{"type": "performance-analyst", "weight": 0.2}
]
)sequential_review_workflow = [
{"phase": "design-review", "agent": "architect-reviewer"},
{"phase": "implementation-review", "agent": "code-quality-reviewer"},
{"phase": "testing-review", "agent": "test-coverage-analyst"},
{"phase": "deployment-readiness", "agent": "devops-validator"}
]hybrid_review_strategy = {
"parallel_agents": ["security", "performance"],
"sequential_agents": ["architecture", "compliance"]
}The tool is designed with a plugin-based architecture, allowing easy addition of new agent types and review strategies.
Target for review: $ARGUMENTS
e63f7dd
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.