Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-organized and adequately sequenced, but the body is conceptually abstract, lacks concrete actionable patterns, and carries some verbatim duplication of the description.
Suggestions
Replace abstract steps with concrete patterns: e.g. show an event schema shape, a command-handler/event-application snippet, or a decision rule for when to snapshot versus rebuild projections.
Remove the verbatim restatement of the description at the top and deduplicate the 'never delete/modify events' rule between Safety and Best Practices.
Add a validation/checkpoint step in the Instructions workflow, such as verifying event schema backward compatibility after versioning or testing projections against known events before deploy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean bullet lists, but the opening paragraph duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim and 'Events are facts - never delete or modify them' restates the Safety line, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Instructions like 'Identify aggregate boundaries', 'Design events as immutable facts', and 'Implement command handlers' are high-level direction rather than concrete patterns, schemas, or decision rules; it describes more than it instructs. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step numbered sequence is present (identify aggregates through set up versioning), but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, leaving sequence present but checkpoints missing. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a short single-topic skill with no bundle files, it is organized into clearly labeled sections (Capabilities, Use when, Do not use, Instructions, Safety, Best Practices), which satisfies the simple-skill bar for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |