golang-pro

Master Go 1.21+ with modern patterns, advanced concurrency, performance optimization, and production-ready microservices. Expert in the latest Go ecosystem including generics, workspaces, and cutting-edge frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for Go development, architecture design, or performance optimization.

Quality

49%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/golang-pro/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

18%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a padded capability catalog describing what Claude already knows about Go, with no executable code, commands, or validation checkpoints, and no progressive disclosure structure. It functions as a topic outline rather than actionable skill guidance.

Suggestions

Replace the abstract capability bullet lists with concrete, executable guidance: minimal code snippets or specific commands for the most common Go tasks (e.g., a worker-pool pattern, a pprof profiling invocation).

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to the 'Instructions' workflow (e.g., 'run `go vet` and tests; confirm no race conditions with `go test -race` before proceeding').

Move the long capability catalog into separate reference files under references/ and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview that links to them, establishing one-level-deep progressive disclosure.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is a long catalog of capability bullet lists ('Knowledge Base,' 'Behavioral Traits,' 'Capabilities') that largely restate what Claude already knows about Go, with no executable guidance; this is noticeably padded beyond what the skill adds, fitting the 'noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' anchor.	2 / 5
Actionability	There is no concrete code, command, or specific executable instruction anywhere in the body — only abstract descriptions and bullet lists of topics, matching the 'entirely vague or abstract; no concrete code or commands; only describes rather than instructs' anchor.	1 / 5
Workflow Clarity	An 'Instructions' section lists four steps ('Confirm Go version...' through 'Optimize for latency...') and a 'Response Approach' lists eight, but the steps are high-level hints with no validation checkpoints or concrete commands, matching the 'rough sequence present but many gaps; steps poorly defined; validation absent' anchor.	2 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and the body inlines a large capability catalog that clearly belongs in separate reference files, with no external references signaled; this matches the 'content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined' anchor.	2 / 5
	Total	7 / 20 Passed

Description

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger terms and reasonable specificity scoped to modern Go. It could list more concrete actions and a broader set of synonyms to reach the top of the scale.

Suggestions

Add a couple of concrete, specific actions (e.g., 'write goroutine pipelines,' 'profile and optimize hot paths') rather than only naming capability domains.

Include more natural trigger synonyms users might say (e.g., 'Golang,' 'Go modules,' 'Go profiling') to broaden keyword coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the Go domain and a few concrete action areas ('advanced concurrency,' 'performance optimization,' 'production-ready microservices,' 'generics, workspaces') but no fully concrete actions beyond the domain listing, matching the anchor that names domain and 1-2 concrete actions without being comprehensive.	3 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers 'what' ('Master Go 1.21+ ... microservices') and 'when' via the explicit 'Use PROACTIVELY for Go development, architecture design, or performance optimization' trigger clause, matching the anchor that clearly answers both what and when with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural user phrasing is present ('Go development,' 'architecture design,' 'performance optimization') and these are phrases a user would actually say; a few common synonyms or explicit triggers are missing, fitting the 'good keyword coverage with a few natural terms missing' anchor.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoped specifically to Go 1.21+ with distinct triggers (Go development, architecture design), making it mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against generic programming or architecture skills.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Path: skills/golang-pro/SKILL.md
Commit: 3eff4af

Reviewed: 24 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.