Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and concise, but its guidance is high-level and the concrete detail is deferred to a missing playbook file, leaving it thin and not fully actionable. Adding the referenced playbook (or inlining concrete patterns) would substantially raise actionability and progressive_disclosure.
Suggestions
Create the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' (or inline its key patterns) so the '## Resources' link resolves and concrete guidance is available.
Expand the Instructions steps with specific, actionable patterns or examples (e.g., named patterns for service decomposition, event communication options, and resilience techniques like circuit breakers/retries) instead of category-level directives.
Add a brief validation/checklist step (e.g., verify each service owns its data, confirm contracts are versioned) to give the workflow explicit checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with well-organized Use/Don't-use and Instructions sections and no concept over-explanation; the only trimmable redundancy is the intro line restating the description, so it sits just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The instructions are high-level directives ('Identify domain boundaries...', 'Define contracts, data ownership, and communication patterns') with no concrete methodology, patterns, or examples, and the actionable detail is deferred to a playbook file that does not exist; this matches the anchor for minimal concrete guidance with high-level hints. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step numbered sequence is present (identify boundaries, define contracts, plan resilience, provide migration steps) but with no validation checkpoints or feedback loops; this is a design rather than destructive/batch skill so no hard cap applies, landing at the anchor for steps listed with missing checkpoints. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is good and the single reference is one level deep and clearly signaled under '## Resources', but the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' does not exist in the bundle, so navigation is broken and the overview lacks the detailed backing it implies. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |