Content
42%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is highly actionable but suffers from severe verbosity and no progressive disclosure: three complete templates and a facilitation guide are inlined in a single ~380-line file. Splitting templates into reference files and adding a lean quick-start would materially raise quality.
Suggestions
Move the three full templates and facilitation guide into separate files under references/ (e.g. templates/standard-postmortem.md) and link to them from a concise overview, restoring progressive disclosure.
Replace the generic 'Instructions' bullets ('Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes') with concrete, postmortem-specific drafting and validation steps.
Trim the repetitive worked example to essentials or relocate it to an example reference, since Claude can already construct a postmortem once given a template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a ~380-line monolith dominated by three full template documents and a worked example Claude could largely generate itself, with no bundle files to offload detail. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready templates (Standard Postmortem, 5 Whys, Quick Postmortem) with concrete timelines, action-item tables, and a facilitation script. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences exist (timeline, meeting agenda) and validation is implied by review/finalize states, but there is no explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint for the drafting workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the full templates and facilitation guide are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into referenced files, leaving no one-level-deep disclosure structure. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |