CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sql-pro

Master modern SQL with cloud-native databases, OLTP/OLAP optimization, and advanced query techniques. Expert in performance tuning, data modeling, and hybrid analytical systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database optimization or complex analysis.

50

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/sql-pro/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

35%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body reads as a persona-and-capability manifest rather than actionable guidance: heavy on enumerated known facts and light on concrete, executable instruction. Sequencing is present but validation is implicit and the single-file structure is over-sized.

Suggestions

Replace the long Capabilities/Behavioral Traits/Knowledge Base enumerations with a concise overview, moving detailed catalogs into reference files under ./references/ and linking to them one level deep.

Add at least one executable, copy-paste-ready SQL or EXPLAIN example covering a common optimization case so guidance is concrete rather than abstract.

Turn the Instructions into an explicit workflow with validation checkpoints (e.g., 'Run EXPLAIN; if cost > N, revise index/rewrite; re-check') and a fix-and-retry loop for failing plans.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is noticeably verbose, dominated by long enumerations of database products and techniques (Snowflake, BigQuery, GDPR, SQL injection prevention) that Claude already knows, plus persona padding ('You are an expert SQL specialist…'); not quite severe enough to bottom out at 1.

2 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is mostly high-level ('Inspect schema, statistics, and access paths', 'Optimize queries and validate with EXPLAIN') with no executable code, concrete commands, or worked examples; only minimal concrete direction.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Instructions are sequenced 1–4 and a Safety section adds safeguards, but validation checkpoints are implicit ('validate with EXPLAIN', 'Verify correctness') with no fix-and-retry feedback loop.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are clearly headed, but the skill is a 174-line monolith with large capability/knowledge lists inlined that would be better placed in reference files; no bundle files exist.

3 / 5

Total

10

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid, third-person description that names concrete capabilities and provides an explicit 'use when' trigger. It is held back from the top tier by trigger guidance that is somewhat generic and missing natural synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the SQL domain and several concrete action areas ('OLTP/OLAP optimization', 'performance tuning', 'data modeling', 'advanced query techniques'), with only minor coverage gaps; not a fully comprehensive action list so it stops short of 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does and includes a 'when' clause ('Use PROACTIVELY for database optimization or complex analysis'), but the trigger guidance is less explicit/specific than the anchor-5 example.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say ('SQL', 'database optimization', 'complex analysis', 'performance tuning', 'OLTP/OLAP'), but misses common variations and file/product synonyms that would push it to 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The SQL/database-optimization niche is mostly distinct with clear triggers, though 'complex analysis' creates minor overlap risk with general data or analytics skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.