Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, actionable market-sizing workflow with concrete formulas and validation, but it carries generic boilerplate padding and keeps all detail inline in a long monolithic file rather than splitting report templates into reference files.
Suggestions
Remove the generic 'Use this skill when / Do not use this skill when / Instructions' boilerplate blocks that add no domain-specific value.
Extract the 9-section report template (Steps 8) into a separate reference file (e.g., references/report-template.md) referenced from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Strengthen the top-down validation feedback loop with a concrete retry step (e.g., re-baseline the bottom-up assumption that drives the variance, then re-compare) instead of only 'investigate and explain'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete formulas and steps, but includes generic boilerplate filler ('Use this skill when', 'Do not use this skill when', and the vague 'Instructions' block) that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance — explicit formulas (TAM = Segment Size x ACV; SAM = TAM x Geographic % x Product Fit % x Market Readiness %) and specific data sources (Census, BLS, Gartner, 10-K) — with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (Step 5: variance > 30% triggers investigation) and a Step 8 sanity-check section; the feedback loop is light rather than a concrete retry loop, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers, but it is a ~240-line monolithic document with the full report template inlined and no bundle/reference files to split detail into, so structure is only partial. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |