startup-financial-modeling

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create financial projections", "build a financial model", "forecast revenue", "calculate burn rate", "estimate runway", "model cash flow", or requests 3-5 year financial planning for a startup.

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill delivers concrete, well-sequenced financial-modeling guidance with strong validation checkpoints, but it is verbose and inlines reference-style content that belongs in separate files. The dangling references to non-existent bundle files also hurt its progressive-disclosure structure.

Suggestions

Move the four business-model templates, typical-ratio tables, and example projections into reference files (e.g. references/business-model-templates.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview with clearly signaled links.

Either create the referenced references/ and examples/ files or remove the closing pointer to them, so navigation links resolve to real files.

Trim inline explanations of standard concepts (e.g. definitions of COGS/S&M/R&D/G&A categories) to tighten the body and improve token efficiency.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~450-line body inlines substantial reference material (typical ratios, retention tables, four full business-model templates, example projections) that could be tightened or moved to reference files, leaving it mostly efficient but padded.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete formulas, typical ratios, worked examples (e.g. "$150K salary × 1.35 = $202K fully-loaded" and cohort retention curves), giving mostly executable guidance with minor gaps.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 7-step process, a 9-step Quick Start, and a Model Validation checklist with explicit sanity-check boxes provide a well-sequenced flow with validation checkpoints.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Headers are well-organized, but bulk reference material is inlined rather than split out, and the closing pointer to references/ and examples/ points at files that do not exist, leaving references not clearly signaled or backed.	3 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong, with rich natural trigger phrases and a well-scoped niche that minimizes conflict risk. Its only weakness is that the skill's core capability is implied via triggers rather than stated as an explicit declarative "what".

Suggestions

Lead with a concise declarative statement of what the skill does (e.g., "Builds 3-5 year financial models with revenue, cost, cash flow, and scenario projections for early-stage startups.") before the trigger clause to make the "what" explicit.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions ("create financial projections", "build a financial model", "forecast revenue", "calculate burn rate", "estimate runway", "model cash flow") with comprehensive coverage of the domain.	5 / 5
Completeness	Strong explicit "when" via quoted trigger phrases, but the "what" is only implied through those verbs rather than stated as a clear declarative capability, so it falls just below the both-fully-explicit anchor.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes many natural phrases users would actually say, with synonyms spanning projections, modeling, burn rate, runway, and cash flow.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a clear niche (startup 3-5 year financial modeling) with specific triggers, giving minimal overlap risk with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
Path: skills/startup-financial-modeling/SKILL.md
Commit: 3eff4af

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.