Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and reasonably sequenced with a re-test loop, but it lacks executable commands for the named tools and references a playbook file that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add concrete executable commands or examples for the named tools (e.g., an axe CLI invocation or Lighthouse command) to lift actionability.
Provide an explicit validation checkpoint between manual checks and remediation mapping (e.g., 'verify each finding reproduces before recording').
Create the referenced resources/implementation-playbook.md file or remove the dangling reference so progressive disclosure navigation resolves.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient body that assumes Claude's competence, lists only the steps and tools needed, and avoids explaining what WCAG or accessibility concepts are. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names specific tools (axe, Lighthouse, WAVE) but provides no executable commands, code, or flags; the steps read as high-level direction rather than copy-paste-ready guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is present with a re-test feedback loop ('Re-test after fixes'), though explicit validation checkpoints before proceeding are only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The overview points to a referenced file ('resources/implementation-playbook.md') that does not exist in the bundle, and the path is repeated rather than clearly signaled once, leaving navigation unreliable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |