Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight decision-routing skill: it tells Claude when to bridge, which bridge type to pick, where ownership lies, and what risks to validate, then delegates executable detail to four real one-level references. It respects the context budget while remaining concrete and actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no explanation of what SwiftUI or AppKit is; every section (Quick Start, Choose The Smallest Bridge, Workflow, References, Guardrails, Output Expectations) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete decision rules ("Use NSViewRepresentable when you need a specific AppKit view with lightweight lifecycle needs", "SwiftUI owns value state... AppKit objects stay inside the representable") that are directly actionable; executable code is intentionally deferred to verified references, which the instruction-only note permits when guidance is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow with an explicit validation step (step 5: "Validate lifecycle assumptions"); the missing validate-fix-retry loop is not penalized because this is a non-destructive design-decision skill outside the destructive/batch scope the rubric caps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with four well-signaled one-level-deep references, each with a one-line description and all verified to exist as real files (representables.md, window-panels.md, responder-menus.md, drag-drop-pasteboard.md); content is appropriately split with easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |