Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, prescriptive, and rich with specific named APIs and concrete rules, organized into clear sections with a numbered workflow, validation step, checklist, and guardrails. It assumes Claude's competence and adds only design-system-specific knowledge.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and prescriptive, assumes Claude knows SwiftUI and the macOS design system (no concept explanations), and nearly every line is an actionable directive; minor restatement between the workflow, checklist, and guardrails is not enough to drop to the 'some unnecessary explanation' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names specific APIs (glassEffect, GlassEffectContainer, glassEffectID, ToolbarSpacer, sharedBackgroundVisibility, scrollEdgeEffectStyle, buttonBorderShape, neutralValue, containerConcentric, searchable placement rules) with concrete when/how guidance; though instruction-only with no code blocks, the guidance is specific and actionable, which the rubric does not penalize. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 6-step Workflow is followed by an explicit validation step (step 5: verify glass grouping, transitions, icon treatment, and pointer/keyboard usability), a Review Checklist, and Guardrails providing error-prevention feedback; no destructive/batch operation triggers the feedback-loop cap. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files and no nested references, organized into clearly labeled navigable sections (Overview, Workflow, App Structure, Toolbars, Search, Controls, Custom Liquid Glass, Review Checklist, Guardrails, When To Use Other Skills); per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections with no need for external references score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |