Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill with concrete commands and a clear workflow that assumes Claude's competence. The main improvement opportunity is making the test-filtering and failure-diagnosis steps concrete with actual command examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 46-line body is lean and directive throughout — no concept explanations Claude already knows, no padding; every line ("Use `swift build` by default", "Do not assume an app bundle exists") earns its place. Matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance with concrete commands (`swift build`, `swift run <product>`, `swift test`, read `Package.swift`), but "Apply filters when a specific test target or case is known" never shows the concrete `--filter` flag, and the failure-category list is abstract labels rather than commands. Anchor 4 (mostly executable, minor gaps), not 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (inspect → build → run → test → summarize) with a failure-summary step, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint (e.g., "if the build fails, fix and rebuild before running"). Anchor 4 (clear sequence, minor validation gaps), not 3 since the failure-summary step provides implicit error handling. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files; the body is well-organized into Quick Start, Workflow, Guardrails, and Output Expectations sections with no content that needs to be split out. Per the simple-skill guideline this merits 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |